Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T16:19:17.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Universal grammar and mental continuity: Two modern myths

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2009

Derek C. Penn ,
Keith J. Holyoak  and
Daniel J. Povinelli
Derek C. Penn
Affiliation:
Cognitive Evolution Group, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, New Iberia, LA, 70560. [email protected]://www.cognitiveevolutiongroup.org/[email protected]://www.cognitiveevolutiongroup.org/
Keith J. Holyoak
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095. [email protected]://reasoninglab.psych.ucla.edu/
Daniel J. Povinelli
Affiliation:
Cognitive Evolution Group, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, New Iberia, LA, 70560. [email protected]://www.cognitiveevolutiongroup.org/[email protected]://www.cognitiveevolutiongroup.org/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In our opinion, the discontinuity between extant human and nonhuman minds is much broader and deeper than most researchers admit. We are happy to report that Evans & Levinson's (E&L's) target article strongly corroborates our unpopular hypothesis, and that the comparative evidence, in turn, bolsters E&L's provocative argument. Both a Universal Grammar and the “mental continuity” between human and nonhuman minds turn out to be modern myths.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 5 , October 2009 , pp. 462 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bermudez, J. L. (2005) Philosophy of psychology: A contemporary introduction. Routledge.Google Scholar
Bickerton, D. (2009) Adam's tongue: How humans made language, how language made humans. Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Christiansen, M. H. & Chater, N. (2008) Language as shaped by the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31(5):489–509; discussion 509–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, A. (2006) Language, embodiment, and the cognitive niche. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(8):370–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Darwin, C. (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. John Murray.Google Scholar
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, W. T. (2002) The faculty of language: What is it, who has it and how did it evolve? Science 298(5598):1569–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holyoak, K. J. & Hummel, J. E. (2000) The proper treatment of symbols in a connectionist architecture. In: Cognitive dynamics: Conceptual change in humans and machines, ed. Dietrich, E. & Markman, A. B., pp. 229–63. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Holyoak, K. J., Junn, E. N. & Billman, D. O. (1984) Development of analogical problem-solving skill. Child Development 55(6):2042–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewenstein, J. & Gentner, D. (2005) Relational language and the development of relational mapping. Cognitive Psychology 50(4):315–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D. B. & Levinson, S. C. (2004) Can language restructure cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Science 8(3):108–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Morsanyi, K. & Holyoak, K. J. (in press) Analogical reasoning ability in autistic and typically developing children. Developmental Science.Google Scholar
Newell, A. (1980) Physical symbol systems. Cognitive Science 4:135–83.Google Scholar
Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J. & Povinelli, D. J. (2008) Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31(2):109–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penn, D. C. & Povinelli, D. J. (2007a) Causal cognition in human and nonhuman animals: A comparative, critical review. Annual Review of Psychology 58:97–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penn, D. C. & Povinelli, D. J. (2007b) On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a “theory of mind.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 362:731–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Penn, D. C. & Povinelli, D. J. (in press) The comparative delusion: The“behavioristic”/ “mentalistic” dichotomy in comparative theory of mind research. In: Oxford handbook of philosophy and cognitive science, ed. Samuels, R. & Stich, S. P.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1994) The language instinct. W. Morrow.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Povinelli, D. J. (2000) Folk physics for apes: The chimpanzee's theory of how the world works. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Povinelli, D. J. & Vonk, J. (2003) Chimpanzee minds: Suspiciously human? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7(4):157–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M. (2008) The origins of human communication. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar