Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:41:34.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two remarks on the characterization of IBBs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Robert J. Matthews
Robert J. Matthews
Affiliation:
Philosophy Department, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass. 02138
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 2 , June 1978 , pp. 239 - 240
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, J. R.Language, Memory, and Thought. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum Associates, 1976.Google Scholar
Bobrow, D. G., and Winograd, T.An Overview of KRL, a knowledge representation language. Cognitive Science. 1:1:3–46. 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charniak, E., and Wilks, Y.Computational Semantics. Amsterdam, North Holland, 1976.Google Scholar
Fodor, J. A.The Language of Thought. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1975.Google Scholar
Minsky, M. A framework for representing knowledge. In: Winston, P., (ed.), The Psychology of Computer Vision. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1975.Google Scholar
Winograd, T.Towards a Procedural Understanding of Semantics. Revue Internationale de Philosophie. 117–118:260–303. 1976.Google Scholar