Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:11:55.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Standards of evidence for designed sex differences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 August 2009

Aaron Sell
Aaron Sell
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-9660. [email protected]://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/grads/Sell.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

At the heart of the debate between social role theorists and evolutionary psychologists is whether natural selection has designed the minds of the sexes differently to some interesting extent. In this commentary I describe the standards of evidence for both the positive and negative claims. In my opinion, Archer has met the standard for designed sex differences in intrasexual conflict.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 32 , Issue 3-4 , August 2009 , pp. 289
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alcock, J. (1998) Animal behavior, 6th edition.Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Daly, M. & Wilson, M. (1983) Sex, evolution and behavior, 2nd edition.Willard Grant/ Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Daly, M. & Wilson, M. (1988) Homicide. Aldine de Gruyter.Google ScholarPubMed
Garn, S. & Clark, L. (1953) The sex difference in the basal metabolic rate. Child Development 24:215–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huntingford, F. A. & Turner, A. K. (1987) Animal conflict. Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lassek, W. D. & Gaulin, S. J. C. (in press) Costs and benefits of fat-free muscle mass in men: Relationship to mating success, dietary requirements, and natural immunity. Evolution and Human Behavior.Google Scholar
Maynard Smith, J., & Price, G. (1973) The logic of animal conflict. Nature 246 (5427):15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, G. A., Baker, R. R. & Smith, V. G. (1972) The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon. Journal of Theoretical Biology 36(3):529–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smuts, B., Cheney, D., Seyfarth, R., Wrangham, R. & Struhsaker, T. (1987) Primate societies. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Symons, D. (1978) Play and aggression. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Tooby, J. (1982) Pathogens, polymorphism and the evolution of sex. Journal of Theoretical Biology 97:557–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williams, G. (1957) Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution 11(4): 398–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, W. & Eagly, A. H. (2002) A cross-cultural analysis of the behavior of women and men: Implications for the origins of sex differences. Psychological Bulletin 128:699–727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed