Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T20:44:59.518Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some notes on priming, alignment, and self-monitoring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2004

Niels O. Schiller  and
Jan Peter de Ruiter
Niels O. Schiller*
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology, Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlandshttp://www.psychology.unimaas.nl/Base/Personal/NielsSchiller.htm Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlandshttp://www.mpi.nl/world/persons/profession/schiller.html
Jan Peter de Ruiter*
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, 6500 AH Nijmegen, The Netherlandshttp://www.mpi.nl/world/persons/profession/schiller.html
*
[email protected][email protected]
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Any complete theory of speaking must take the dialogical function of language use into account. Pickering & Garrod (P&G) make some progress on this point. However, we question whether their interactive alignment model is the optimal approach. In this commentary, we specifically criticize (1) their notion of alignment being implemented through priming, and (2) their claim that self-monitoring can occur at all levels of linguistic representation.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 208 - 209
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)