Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T19:11:41.235Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sociocultural memory development research drives new directions in gadgetry science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 September 2019

Penny Van Bergen
Affiliation:
Centre for Children's Learning in a Social World, Department of Educational Studies, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. [email protected]://researchers.mq.edu.au/en/persons/penny-van-bergen
John Sutton
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. [email protected]://johnsutton.net/

Abstract

Sociocultural developmental psychology can drive new directions in gadgetry science. We use autobiographical memory, a compound capacity incorporating episodic memory, as a case study. Autobiographical memory emerges late in development, supported by interactions with parents. Intervention research highlights the causal influence of these interactions, whereas cross-cultural research demonstrates culturally determined diversity. Different patterns of inheritance are discussed.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, R., Van Bergen, P. & Wyver, S. (submitted) Children’s, educators’, and mothers’ use of mental state language during conversations about the past and future.Google Scholar
Bauer, P. (1996) What do infants recall of their lives? Memory for specific events by 1- and 2-year-olds. American Psychologist 51(1):2941.Google Scholar
Bauer, P. (2015) A complementary processes account of the development of childhood amnesia and a personal past. Psychological Review 122(2):204–31.Google Scholar
Fivush, R., Haden, C. A. & Reese, E. (2006) Elaborating on elaborations: Role of maternal reminiscing style in cognitive and socioemotional development. Child Development 77(6):1568–88. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4139261.Google Scholar
Han, J. J., Leichtman, M. D. & Wang, Q. (1998) Autobiographical memory in Korean, Chinese, and American children. Developmental Psychology 34(4):701–13.Google Scholar
Hayne, H. (2004) Infant memory development: Implications for childhood amnesia. Developmental Review 24(1):3373.Google Scholar
Heyes, C. (2018) Cognitive gadgets: The cultural evolution of thinking. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leichtman, M. D., Wang, Q. & Pillemer, D. B. (2003) Cultural variations in interdependence and autobiographical memory: Lessons from Korea, China, India, and the United States. In: Autobiographical memory and the construction of a narrative self, ed. Fivush, R. & Haden, C. A., pp. 7397. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
MacDonald, S., Uesiliana, K. & Hayne, H. (2000) Cross-cultural and gender differences in childhood amnesia. Memory 8(6):365–76. doi: 10.1080/09658210050156822.Google Scholar
Mullen, M. K. & Yi, S. (1995) The cultural context of talk about the past: Implications for the development of autobiographical memory. Cognitive Development 10(3):407–19.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. A. (1996) Language in cognitive development: The emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. & Fivush, R. (2004) The emergence of autobiographical memory: A social cultural developmental theory. Psychological Review 111(2):486511.Google Scholar
Reese, E., Hayne, H. & MacDonald, S. (2008) Looking back to the future: Māori and Pakeha mother-child birth stories. Child Development 79(1):114–25.Google Scholar
Reese, E. & Newcombe, R. (2007) Training mothers in elaborative reminiscing enhances children's autobiographical memory and narrative. Child Development 78(4):1153–70.Google Scholar
Salmon, K., Dadds, M. R., Allen, J. & Hawes, D. (2009) Can emotional language skills be taught during parent training for conduct problem children? Child Psychiatry & Human Development 40(4):485–98.Google Scholar
Salmon, K. & Reese, E. (2016) The benefits of reminiscing with young children. Current Directions in Psychological Science 25(4):233–38.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. (2015) Scaffolding memory: Themes, taxonomies, puzzles. In: Contextualizing human memory, ed. Bietti, L. & Stone, C. B., pp. 187205. Routledge.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. (2019) Personal memory, the scaffolded mind, and cognitive change in the Neolithic. In: Consciousness, creativity and self at the dawn of settled life, ed. Hodder, I.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Valentino, K., Comas, M., Nuttall, A. K. & Thomas, T. (2013) Training maltreating parents in elaborative and emotion-rich reminiscing with their preschool-aged children. Child Abuse & Neglect 37(8):585–95.Google Scholar
Van Bergen, P., Salmon, K. & Dadds, M. R. (2018) Coaching mothers of typical and conduct problem children in elaborative parent-child reminiscing: Implications of a randomised control trial on reminiscing behaviour and talk preferences. Behaviour Research and Therapy 111:918.Google Scholar
Van Bergen, P., Salmon, K., Dadds, M. R. & Allen, J. (2009) The effects of mother training in emotion-rich, elaborative reminiscing on children's shared recall and emotion knowledge. Journal of Cognition and Development 10:162–87.Google Scholar
Wang, Q. (2004) The emergence of cultural self-constructs: Autobiographical memory and self-description in European American and Chinese Children. Developmental Psychology 40(1):315.Google Scholar
Wang, Q. (2013) The autobiographical self in time and culture. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Q. (2018) Culture in collaborative remembering. In: Collaborative remembering: Theories, research and applications, ed. Meade, M., Harris, C., Van Bergen, P., Sutton, J. & Barnier, A., pp. 297314. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wareham, P. & Salmon, K. (2006) Mother-child reminiscing about everyday experiences: Implications for clinical interventions in the preschool years. Clinical Psychology Review 26(5):535–54.Google Scholar