Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T06:42:05.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Social-affective origins of mindreading and metacognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2009

Philippe Rochat
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322. [email protected]

Abstract

The engineer's look at how the mind works omits a central piece of the puzzle. It ignores the dynamic of motivations and the social context in which mindreading and metacognition evolved and developed in the first place. Mindreading and metacognition derive from a primacy of affective mindreading and meta-affectivity (e.g., secondary emotions such as shame or pride), both co-emerging in early development.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amsterdam, B. (1972) Mirror self-image reactions before age two. Developmental Psychobiology 5:297305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bigelow, A. & Rochat, P. (2006) Two-month-old infants' sensitivity to social contingency in mother-infant and stranger-infant interaction. Infancy 9(3):313–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
James, W. (1872) Are we automata? Mind 4:122.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. (1992) Shame: The exposed self. Free Press.Google Scholar
Reddy, V. (2003) On being an object of attention: Implications for self-other-consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Science 7(9):397402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rochat, P. (2009) Others in mind – Social origins of self-consciousness. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topal, J., Gergely, G., Miklosi, A., Erdohegyi, A. & Csibra, G. (2008) Infant perseverative errors are induced by pragmatic misinterpretation. Science 321:1831–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tronick, E. Z. (2005) Why is connection with others so critical? The formation of dyadic states of consciousness and the expansion of individuals' states of consciousness: Coherence governed selection and the co-creation of meaning out of messy meaning making. In: Emotional development, ed. Nadel, J. & Muir, D., pp. 293315. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tronick, E. Z., Als, H., Adamson, L., Wise, S. & Brazelton, T. B. (1978) The infant's response to entrapment between contradictory messages in face-to-face interaction. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry 17:113.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed