Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:45:25.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Should labeled lines and pattern models be either-or? Issues of scope and definition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2008

Jennifer A. Stillman
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Massey University Albany, Auckland 1311, New Zealand. [email protected]

Abstract

Erickson's conclusion that if basic tastes are not appropriate at one level, reference to labeled lines is inappropriate at any level, depends on matters of definition and scope. His population model mirrors Young's theory of color perception. However, there is evidence for distinct pathways to the cortex for two cone-opponent and one achromatic channel. Depending on the use made of key terms, sensory systems may display both across-fiber and labeled-line features.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Erickson, R. P. (1977) The role of “primaries” in taste research. In: Olfaction and taste, vol. 6, ed. Le Magnen, J. & MacLeod, P., pp. 369–76. Information Retrieval.Google Scholar
Mullen, K. T. & Kingdom, F. A. A. (2002) Differential distributions of red-green and blue-yellow cone opponency across the visual field. Visual Neuroscience 19:109–18.Google Scholar
Stillman, J. A. (2002) Gustation: Inter-sensory experience par excellence. Perception 31:14911500.Google Scholar