No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Scientific psychology and tenure
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 February 2007
Abstract:
Ceci et al. draw conclusions that are inaccurate, analyze and report results inappropriately, fail to translate their scale into policy-relevant terms, and draw overly strong conclusions from their single study. They also attribute all the ills of academic appointments to tenure, and ignore problems with other aspects of the system. Their conclusion that tenure is not supported is at best premature.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007