Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:42:55.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scientific psychology and tenure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2007

James M. Clark
James M. Clark*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Winnipeg, Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3B 2E9, Canada www.uwinnipeg.ca/~clark
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Ceci et al. draw conclusions that are inaccurate, analyze and report results inappropriately, fail to translate their scale into policy-relevant terms, and draw overly strong conclusions from their single study. They also attribute all the ills of academic appointments to tenure, and ignore problems with other aspects of the system. Their conclusion that tenure is not supported is at best premature.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 29 , Issue 6 , December 2006 , pp. 571 - 572
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)