Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:46:16.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A role for normativism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

Igor Douven
Igor Douven
Affiliation:
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, 9712 GL Groningen, The Netherlands. [email protected]/staff/i.e.j.douven/index
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Elqayam & Evans (E&E) argue against prescriptive normativism and in favor of descriptivism. I challenge the assumption, implicit in their article, that there is a choice to be made between the two approaches. While descriptivism may be the right approach for some questions, others call for a normativist approach. To illustrate the point, I briefly discuss two questions of the latter sort.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 5 , October 2011 , pp. 252 - 253
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Douven, I. & Dietz, R. (2011) A puzzle about Stalnaker's hypothesis. Topoi 30:31–37.Google Scholar
Douven, I. & Romeijn, J. W. (in press) A new resolution of the Judy Benjamin problem. Mind.Google Scholar
Joyce, J. (1998) A nonpragmatic vindication of probabilism. Philosophy of Science 65(4):575–603.Google Scholar
Rosenkrantz, R. (1992) The justification of induction. Philosophy of Science 59(4):527–39.Google Scholar
Skyrms, B. (1980) Causal necessity. Yale University Press.Google Scholar