Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T23:49:48.275Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relational priming: Obligational nitpicking

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2008

Varol Akman
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Bilkent University, Bilkent, Ankara, 06800, Turkey. [email protected]://www.phil.bilkent.edu.tr/akman.htm

Abstract

According to the target article authors, initial experience with a circumstance primes a relation that can subsequently be applied to a different circumstance to draw an analogy. While I broadly agree with their claim about the role of relational priming in early analogical reasoning, I put forward a few concerns that may be worthy of further reflection.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Akman, V. (2007) Similar situations. In: Context and appropriateness: Micro meets macro, ed. Fetzer, A., pp. 3154. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barwise, J. & Perry, J. (1983) Situations and attitudes. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Devlin, K. (1991) Logic and information. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Estes, Z. & Jones, L. L. (2006) Priming via relational similarity: A copper horse is faster when seen through a glass eye. Journal of Memory and Language 55(1):89101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K. D. & Gentner, D. (1989) The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence 41(1):163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recanati, F. (2004) Literal meaning. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Thagard, P., Holyoak, K. J., Nelson, G. & Gochfeld, D. (1990) Analog retrieval by constraint satisfaction. Artificial Intelligence 46(3):259310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar