Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:45:41.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The rationality debate from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2001

Seymour Epstein
Seymour Epstein
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003 [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A problem with Stanovich & West's inference that there a nonintellectual processing system independent from an intellectual one from data in which they partialled out global intelligence is that they may have controlled for the wrong kind of intellectual intelligence. Research on cognitive-experiential self-theory over the past two decades provides much stronger support for two independent processing systems.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 5 , October 2000 , pp. 671
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)