Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:50:54.332Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quantifying the interpersonal expectancy effect: on the place of statistical significance in a program of research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Arie W. Kruglanski
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat-Aviv, Israel

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bakan, D.The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin. 66:423437, 1966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Braun, C.Teacher expectation: Sociopsychological dynamics. Review of Educational Research. 46:185213, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brophy, J. E. & Good, T. L.Teachers' communication of differential expectations for children's classroom performance: Some behavioral data. Journal of Educational Psychology. 61:365374, 1970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, D. T. Prospective: artifact and control. In: Rosenthal, R. and Rosnow, R. L. (eds.), Artifact in behavioral research. Academic Press, New York, 1969.Google Scholar
Dusek, J. B.Do teachers bias children–s learning? Review of Educational Research. 45:661684, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W. The human subject in the psychology experiment: Fact and artifact. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. 8:101147, 1975.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W. & Kroy, M.Outcome validity in experimental research: A re-conceptualization. Representative Research in Social Psychology. 7:166178, 1976.Google Scholar