Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:30:31.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Planning differences for chromaticity- and luminance-defined stimuli: A possible problem for Glover's planning–control model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2004

Charles E. Wright  and
Charles Chubb
Charles E. Wright*
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA92697-5100http://www.faculty.uci.edu/scripts/UCIFacultyProfiles/DetailDept.CFM?ID=2451http://www.cogsci.uci.edu/personnel/chubb/chubb.shtml
Charles Chubb*
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA92697-5100http://www.faculty.uci.edu/scripts/UCIFacultyProfiles/DetailDept.CFM?ID=2451http://www.cogsci.uci.edu/personnel/chubb/chubb.shtml
*
[email protected]
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We report data from an experiment using stimuli designed to differ in their availability for processing by the dorsal visual pathway, but which were equivalent in tasks mediated by the ventral pathway. When movements are made to these stimuli as targets, there are clear effects early in the movement. These effects appear at odds with the planning–control model of Glover.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 55 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Note

1. Equiluminant greens differing in saturation were determined for each subject using a flicker-fusion procedure.