Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T17:44:24.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parasite stress is not so critical to the history of religions or major modern group formations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2012

Scott Atran
Scott Atran
Affiliation:
UMR 8129, CNRS / Institut Jean Nicod – Ecole Normale Supérieure, 75005 Paris, France. [email protected]://sitemaker.umich.edu/satran/home
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Fincher & Thornhill's (F&T's) central hypothesis is that strong in-group norms were formed in part to foster parochial social alliances so as to enable cultural groups to adaptively respond to parasite stress. Applied to ancestral hominid environments, the story fits with evolutionary theory and the fragmentary data available on early hominid social formations and their geographical distributions. Applied to modern social formations, however, the arguments and inferences from data are problematic.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 2 , April 2012 , pp. 79 - 80
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Atran, S. (2001) Response to Gil-White (Are ethnic groups of the essence for humankind?) Current Anthropology 42:537–38.Google Scholar
Atran, S. (2010) Talking to the enemy: Violent extremism, sacred values, and what it means to be human. Penguin.Google Scholar
Atran, S. & Axelrod, R. (2008) Reframing sacred values. Negotiation Journal 24:221–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atran, S. & Henrich, J. (2010) The evolution of religion: How cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions. Biological Theory 5:18–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atran, S. & Norenzayan, A. (2004) Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27:713–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bamshad, M., Kivisild, T., Watkins, W. S., Dixon, M., Ricker, C., Rao, B., Naidu, J. M., Prasad, B. V. R., Reddy, P. G., Rasanayagam, A., Papiha, S. S., Villems, R., Redd, A. J., Hammer, M. F., Nguyen, S. V., Carroll, M. L., Batzer, M. A. & Jorder, L. B. (2001) Genetic evidence on the origins of Indian caste populations. Genome Research 11:994–1004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Tocqueville, A. (1835/1984) Democracy in America. Penguin. (Original work published in 1835).Google Scholar
Dowe, D., ed. (2001) Europe in 1848: Revolution and reform. Berghahn.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, R. (2001) Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Risse, G. (1999) Mending bodies, saving souls: A history of hospitals. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, R. (1997) The rise of Christianity: How the obscure, marginal Jesus movement became the dominant religious force in the Western world in a few centuries. HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Stoler, A. (2010) Carnal knowledge and imperial power: Race and the intimate in colonial rule. University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. (1958) The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism, trans. Parsons, T.. Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar