On the nature of structure in structural priming

Nayoung Kwon; Yoonhyoung Lee

doi:10.1017/S0140525X17000474

On the nature of structure in structural priming

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 November 2017

Nayoung Kwon and

Yoonhyoung Lee

Show author details

Nayoung Kwon: Affiliation:
Department of English, Konkuk University, Seoul,143-701, Republic of Korea. [email protected]
Yoonhyoung Lee: Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, 712-749, Republic of Korea. [email protected]

Article contents

Abstract
References

Get access

Rights & Permissions

Abstract

Like Branigan & Pickering (B&P), we agree that processing evidence is important for linguistic theorization; however, without much evidence of priming of hierarchical argument structure independent of linear ordering, the nature of “structure” in structural priming remains unclear. Consequently, it is an empirical question whether structural priming and acceptability judgments tap into cognitive processes of a similar nature.

Type: Open Peer Commentary
Information: Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e299

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17000474 [Opens in a new window]
Copyright: Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bock, J. K. (1986) Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18(3):355–87. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90004-6 Google Scholar

Bock, K. (1989) Closed-class immanence in sentence production. Cognition 31(2):163–86. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(89)90022-X.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, vol. 119. MIT Press. doi:10.1016/0732-118X(86)90008-5.Google Scholar

Chomsky, N. (1977) On Wh-movement. In: Formal syntax, ed. Akmajian, A., Culicover, P. & Wasow, T., pp. 71–132. Academic Press.Google Scholar

Hare, M. L. & Goldberg, A. E. (1999) Structural priming: Purely syntactic? In: Proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, ed. Hahn, M. & Stones, S. C., pp. 208–11. Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Hartsuiker, R. J. & Westenberg, C. (2000) Word order priming in written and spoken sentence production. Cognition 75(2):B27–39. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00080-3.Google Scholar

Konopka, A. E. & Bock, K. (2009) Lexical or syntactic control of sentence formulation? Structural generalizations from idiom production. Cognitive Psychology 58(1):68–101. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2008.05.002.Google Scholar

Langacker, R. (1969) On pronominalization and the chain of command. In: Modern studies in English, ed. Reibel, D. A., Schane, S. A. & Cliffs, E., pp. 160–86. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Messenger, K., Branigan, H. P., McLean, J. F. & Sorace, A. (2012b) Is young children's passive syntax semantically constrained? Evidence from syntactic priming. Journal of Memory and Language 66(4):568–87. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.03.008.Google Scholar

Pickering, M. J. & Branigan, H. P. (1998) The representation of verbs: Evidence from syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language 39(4):633–51.Google Scholar

Pickering, M. J., Branigan, H. P. & McLean, J. F. (2002) Constituent structure is formulated in one stage. Journal of Memory and Language 46(3):586–605. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2824.Google Scholar

Reinhart, T. (1983) Anaphora and semantic interpretation. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Scheepers, C., Sturt, P., Martin, C. J., Myachykov, A., Teevan, K. & Viskupova, I. (2011) Structural priming across cognitive domains: From simple arithmetic to relative-clause attachment. Psychological Science 22(10):1319–26. doi:10.1177/0956797611416997.Google Scholar