Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:43:06.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ODD (observation- and description-deprived) psychological research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2010

Tage S. Rai
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095. [email protected]@gmail.comwww.rmt.ucla.edu
Alan Fiske
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90095. [email protected]

Abstract

Most psychological research consists of experiments that put people in artificial situations that elicit unnatural behavior whose ecological validity is unknown. Without knowing the psychocultural meaning of experimental situations, we cannot interpret the responses of WEIRD people, let alone people in other cultures. Psychology, like other sciences, needs to be solidly rooted in naturalistic observation and description of people around the world. Theory should be inductively developed and tested against real-world behavior.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cialdini, R. (2009) We have to break up. Perspectives on Psychological Science 4:56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gurven, M. & Winking, J. (2008) Collective action in action: Prosocial behavior in and out of the laboratory. American Anthropologist 110(2):179–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LeVine, R. A. & Norman, K. (2001) The infant's acquisition of culture: Early attachment reexamined in anthropological perspective. In: The psychology of cultural experience, ed. Moore, C. C. & Mathews, H. F., pp. 83104. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar