Article contents
A note on methodology in linguistics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 October 2009
Abstract
Evans & Levinson's (E&L's) critique of Universal Grammar fails because their methodology is flawed, as illustrated in their discussion of the Subjacency Condition. The lack of explicit analysis leads the authors to a false conclusion that is refuted by work published in this journal twenty years ago. They miss the point that unanalyzed data cannot disprove grammatical hypotheses.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
References
- 3
- Cited by