No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Non-interpretative metacognition for true beliefs
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 April 2009
Abstract
Mindreading often requires access to beliefs, so the mindreading system should be able to self-attribute beliefs, even without self-interpretation. This proposal is consistent with Carruthers' claim that mindreading and metacognition depend on the same cognitive system and the same information as one another; and it may be more consistent with this claim than is Carruthers' account of metacognition.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
References
Fodor, J. (1992) A theory of the child's theory of mind. Cognition 44:283–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, A. M., Friedman, O. & German, T. P. (2004) Core mechanisms in “theory of mind.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:528–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, A. M. & Thaiss, L. (1992) Domain specificity in conceptual development: Neuropsychological evidence from autism. Cognition 43:225–51.Google Scholar
Nisbett, R. & Wilson, T. (1977) Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review 84:231–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar