Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-n7qbj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-12T06:44:38.279Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The need to consider additional variables when summarizing agrammatism research

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2001

M. Cherilyn Young  and
Judith A. Hutchinson
M. Cherilyn Young
Affiliation:
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712. [email protected]@aol.com uts.cc.utexas.edu/~cyoung
Judith A. Hutchinson
Affiliation:
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712. [email protected]@aol.com uts.cc.utexas.edu/~cyoung
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Throughout the history of aphasiology, researchers have identified important premorbid and stroke-related predictors of linguistic performance. Although Grodzinsky discusses some of these variables, exclusion of other variables could lead to unnecessary experimental error and erroneous conclusions. Aspects to consider include sources of experimental bias, premorbid differences, nonlinguistic roles of the frontal regions, and comparison of normal and aphasic performance.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , February 2000 , pp. 54
Copyright
© 2000 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)