Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:15:48.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morals, beliefs, and counterfactuals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2010

Vittorio Girotto ,
Luca Surian  and
Michael Siegal
Vittorio Girotto
Affiliation:
Department of Arts and Design, University IUAV of Venice, 30123 Venice, Italy, and Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology, CNRS and University of Provence, 13003 Marseilles, France. [email protected]://www.iuav.it/Ricerca1/Dipartimen/dADI/Docenti/girotto-vi/index.htm
Luca Surian
Affiliation:
Department of Cognitive Sciences and Education, Center for Mind/Brain Sciences. University of Trento, 38068 Rovereto (TN), Italy. [email protected]://portale.unitn.it/cimec/persone/luca.surian
Michael Siegal
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield S10 2TP, United Kingdom. [email protected]://alacode.psico.units.it/index.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We have found that moral considerations interact with belief ascription in determining intentionality judgment. We attribute this finding to a differential availability of plausible counterfactual alternatives that undo the negative side-effect of an action. We conclude that Knobe's thesis does not account for processes by which counterfactuals are generated and how these processes affect moral evaluations.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , August 2010 , pp. 337 - 338
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blair, R. J. R. (1996) Brief report: Morality in the autistic child. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 26:571–79.Google ScholarPubMed
Girotto, V., Ferrante, D., Pighin, S. & Gonzalez, M. (2007) Post-decisional counterfactual thinking by actors and readers. Psychological Science 18:510–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Girotto, V., Legrenzi, P. & Rizzo, A. (1991) Counterfactual thinking: The role of events controllability. Acta Psychologica 78:111–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. & Miller, D. (1986) Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review 93:136–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leslie, A. M., Friedman, O. & German, T. P. (2004) Core mechanisms in “Theory of Mind.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:528–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leslie, A. M., Mallon, R. & DiCorcia, J. A. (2006b) Transgressors, victims, and cry babies: Is basic moral judgment spared in autism? Social Neuroscience 1:270–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macrae, C. N. (1992) A tale of two curries: Counterfactual thinking and accident-related judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 18:84–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellizzoni, S., Girotto, V. & Surian, L. (2010) Beliefs and moral valence affect intentionality attributions: The case of side effects. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 1:201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellizzoni, S., Siegal, M. & Surian, L. (2009) Foreknowledge, caring, and the side-effect effect in young children. Developmental Psychology 45:289–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surian, L., Caldi, S. & Sperber, D. (2007) Attribution of beliefs by 13-month-old infants. Psychological Science 18:580–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uttich, K. & Lombrozo, T. (2010) Norms inform mental state ascriptions: A rational explanation for the side-effect effect. Cognition 116:87–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed