Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Richardson, Daniel C
and
Spivey, Michael J
2000.
Representation, space and Hollywood Squares: looking at things that aren't there anymore.
Cognition,
Vol. 76,
Issue. 3,
p.
269.
Walker, R.
Mannan, S.
Maurer, D.
Pambakian, A. L. M.
and
Kennard, C.
2000.
The oculomotor distractor effect in normal and hemianopic vision.
Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences,
Vol. 267,
Issue. 1442,
p.
431.
Reingold, Eyal M.
and
Stampe, Dave M.
2000.
Reading as a Perceptual Process.
p.
119.
Inhoff, Albrecht W.
Radach, Ralph
Starr, Matt
and
Greenberg, Seth
2000.
Reading as a Perceptual Process.
p.
221.
Liversedge, Simon P.
and
Findlay, John M.
2000.
Saccadic eye movements and cognition.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 1,
p.
6.
Vonk, Wietske
Radach, Ralph
and
van Rijn, Hedderik
2000.
Reading as a Perceptual Process.
p.
269.
Olivier, E.
Corvisier, J.
Pauluis, Q.
and
Hardy, O.
2000.
Evidence for glutamatergic tectotectal neurons in the cat superior colliculus: a comparison with GABAergic tectotectal neurons.
European Journal of Neuroscience,
Vol. 12,
Issue. 7,
p.
2354.
Vergilino, Dorine
and
Beauvillain, Cécile
2000.
The planning of refixation saccades in reading.
Vision Research,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 25,
p.
3527.
Bichot, N.P.
2001.
Neural mechanisms of top-down selection during visual search.
Vol. 1,
Issue. ,
p.
780.
Land, Michael F.
and
Hayhoe, Mary
2001.
In what ways do eye movements contribute to everyday activities?.
Vision Research,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 25-26,
p.
3559.
Clohessy, Anne B
Posner, Michael I
and
Rothbart, Mary K
2001.
Development of the functional visual field.
Acta Psychologica,
Vol. 106,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
51.
Murthy, Aditya
Thompson, Kirk G.
and
Schall, Jeffrey D.
2001.
Dynamic Dissociation of Visual Selection From Saccade Programming in Frontal Eye Field.
Journal of Neurophysiology,
Vol. 86,
Issue. 5,
p.
2634.
Thompson, K.G.
2001.
Neural mechanisms of bottom-up selection during visual search.
Vol. 1,
Issue. ,
p.
776.
Doyle, Melanie C
and
Snowden, Robert J
2001.
Identification of Visual Stimuli is Improved by Accompanying Auditory Stimuli: The Role of Eye Movements and Sound Location.
Perception,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 7,
p.
795.
Findlay, John M.
and
Gilchrist, Iain D.
2001.
Vision and Attention.
p.
83.
Darrien, Jennifer H
Herd, Katrina
Starling, Lisa-Jo
Rosenberg, Jay R
and
Morrison, James D
2001.
An analysis of the dependence of saccadic latency on target position and target characteristics in human subjects.
BMC Neuroscience,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 1,
McSorley, E
and
Findlay, J.M
2001.
Visual search in depth.
Vision Research,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 25-26,
p.
3487.
Yang, S.-N
and
McConkie, G.W
2001.
Eye movements during reading: a theory of saccade initiation times.
Vision Research,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 25-26,
p.
3567.
Saida, Shinya
Ono, Hiroshi
and
Mapp, Alistair P
2001.
Closed-loop and open-loop accommodative vergence eye movements.
Vision Research,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 1,
p.
77.
Colonius, Hans
and
Arndt, Petra
2001.
A two-stage model for visual-auditory interaction in saccadic latencies.
Perception & Psychophysics,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 1,
p.
126.