Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:38:13.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The mimetic dolphin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2001

Gordon B. Bauer  and
Heidi E. Harley
Gordon B. Bauer
Affiliation:
Division of Social Sciences, New College of the University of South Florida, Sarasota, FL 34243; Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, FL 34236 [email protected]@sar.usf.edu
Heidi E. Harley
Affiliation:
Division of Social Sciences, New College of the University of South Florida, Sarasota, FL 34243; Mote Marine Laboratory, Sarasota, FL 34236 [email protected]@sar.usf.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Rendell and Whitehead note the necessary, complementary relationship between field and laboratory studies in other species, but conclude their article by de-emphasizing the role of laboratory findings in cetacean research. The ambiguity in field studies of cetaceans should argue for greater reliance on the laboratory, which has provided much of the available research supporting the hypothesis of cetacean culture.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 326 - 327
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)