Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:55:51.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The “mesh” as evidence – model comparison and alternative interpretations of feedback

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2008

Oliver J. Hulme
Affiliation:
Anatomy Department, Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London WC1E6BT, England, United Kingdom
Louise Whiteley
Affiliation:
Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, England, United Kingdom. [email protected]@ucl.ac.ukhttp://www.gatsby.ucl.ac.uk/~louisew/

Abstract

We agree that the relationship between phenomenology and accessibility can be fruitfully investigated via meshing, but we want to emphasise the importance of proper comparison between meshes, as well as considerations that make comparison especially difficult in this domain. We also argue that Block's interpretation of the neural data in his exemplar mesh is incorrect, and propose an alternative.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mackay, D. J. C. (2004) Information theory, inference, and learning algorithms. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pascual-Leone, A. & Walsh, V. (2001) Fast backprojections from the motion to the primary visual area necessary for visual awareness. Science 292(5516):510–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollen, D. A. (1999) On the neural correlates of visual perception. Cerebral Cortex 9(1):419.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeki, S. & Bartels, A. (1999) Toward a theory of visual consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 8(2):225–59.Google Scholar
Zeki, S. & ffytche, D. H. (1998) The Ridoch syndrome: Insights into the neurobiology of conscious vision. Brain 121(Pt 1):2545.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed