Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-06T07:07:42.374Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mental and sensorimotor extrapolation fare better than motion extrapolation in the offset condition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 May 2008

Dirk Kerzel  and
Jochen Müsseler
Dirk Kerzel
Affiliation:
Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l'Éducation, Université de Genève, 1205 Genève, Switzerland; [email protected]://www.unige.ch/fapse/PSY/persons/kerzel/
Jochen Müsseler
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany. [email protected]://www.psych.rwth-aachen.de/ifp-zentral/front_content.php?idcat=222
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Evidence for motion extrapolation at motion offset is scarce. In contrast, there is abundant evidence that subjects mentally extrapolate the future trajectory of weak motion signals at motion offset. Further, pointing movements overshoot at motion offset. We believe that mental and sensorimotor extrapolation is sufficient to solve the problem of perceptual latencies. Both present the advantage of being much more flexible than motion extrapolation.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 206 - 207
Copyright
Copyright ©Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Freyd, J. J. (1987) Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review 94(4):427–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fröhlich, F. W. (1923) Über die Messung der Empfindungszeit. [On the measurement of sensation time]. Zeitschrift für Sinnesphysiologie 54:58–78.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. L. (2005) Representational momentum and related displacement in spatial memory: A review of the findings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12(5):822–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerzel, D. (2003) Mental extrapolation of target position is strongest with weak motion signals and motor responses. Vision Research 43(25):2623–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerzel, D. & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2003) Neuronal processing delays are compensated in the sensorimotor branch of the visual system. Current Biology 13(22):1975–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maus, G. W. & Nijhawan, R. (2006) Forward displacements of fading objects in motion: The role of transient signals in perceiving position. Vision Research 46(26):4375–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müsseler, J. & Kerzel, D. (2004) The trial context determines adjusted localization of stimuli: Reconciling the Fröhlich and onset repulsion effects. Vision Research 44(19):2201–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Müsseler, J., Stork, S. & Kerzel, D. (in press) Localising the onset of moving stimuli by pointing or relative judgment: Variations in the size of the Fröhlich effect. Vision Research.Google Scholar