Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:26:14.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Matching cannot account for context effects on the attention-related negative potential

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

Claude Alain ,
André Achim  and
François Richer
Claude Alain
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Neuroscience de la Cognition, Université du Québec à Montréal, and Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, Québec H3C 3P8, Canada
André Achim
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Neuroscience de la Cognition, Université du Québec à Montréal, and Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, Québec H3C 3P8, Canada
François Richer
Affiliation:
Laboratoire de Neuroscience de la Cognition, Université du Québec à Montréal, and Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montréal, Québec H3C 3P8, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 14 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 761 - 762
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aaltonen, O., Niemi, P., Nyrke, T. & Tuhkanen, M. (1987) Event-related brain potentials and the perception of a phonetic continuum. Biological Psychology 24:197–207. [rRN]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aaltonen, O., Tuomainen, J., Laine, M. & Niemi, P. (in press) Discrimination of speech and non-speech sounds by brain-damaged subjects: Electrophysiological evidence for distinct perceptual processes. Brain and Language. [rRN]Google Scholar
Alain, C., Achirn, A. & Richer, F. (1990) Auditory streaming influences onset of selective attention effect on auditory ERPs. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 16:577. [rRN, CA]Google Scholar
Arthur, D., Hillyard, S., Flynn, E. & Smidt, A. (1989) Neural mechanisms of selective auditory attention. In: Advances in biomagnetism, ed. Kaufman, L.Hoke, M.Stroink, G. & Kotani, M.. Plenum Press. [rRN]Google Scholar
Arthur, D., Lewis, P., Medvick, P. & Flynn, E. (1991) A neuromagnetic study of selective auditory attention. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 78:348–60. [rRN]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bregman, A. S. (1978) The formation of auditory streams. In: Attention and performance 7, ed. Requin, J.. Erlbaum. [CA]Google Scholar
Bregman, A. S. & Campbell, J. (1971) Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. Journal of Experimental Psychology 89:244–49. [CA]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broadbent, D. E. (1982) Task combination and selective intake of information. Acta Psychologica 50:253–90. [aRN]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conlee, J. V. & Kane, E. S. (1982) Descending projection from the inferior colliculus to the dorsal cochlear nucleus in the cat: An autoradiographic study. Neuroscience 7:161–78. [KK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, F. (1984) Function of the thalamic reticular complex: Searchlight hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 81:4586–90. [KK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crowder, R. & Morton, J. (1969) Precategorical acoustic storage. Perception and Psychophysics 5:365–73. [RFP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elverland, H. H. (1977) Descending connections between the superior olivary and cochlear nucleus complexes in the cat studied by autoradiographic and horse radish peroxidase methods. Experimental Brain Research 27:397–412. [KK]Google Scholar
Giard, M. H., Perrin, F., Pernier, J. & Peronnet, F. (1988) Several attentionrelated waveforms in auditory areas: A topographical study. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 69:371–84. [rRN]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J. C. & Hillyard, S. A. (1984) Effects of stimulation rate and attribute cuing on event-related potentials during selective auditory attention. Psychophysiology 21:394–405. [CA]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hari, R., Hamalainen, M., Kaukoranta, E., Makela, J., Joutsiniemi, S.-L. & Tiihonen, J. (1989) Selective listening modifies activity of the human auditory cortex. Experimental Brain Research 74:463–70. [rRN]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hari, R., Rif, J., Lu, S. T. & Sams, M. (submitted) Effects of infrequent changes of spectral and periodicity pitch on the activity of human auditory cortex. [rRN]Google Scholar
Hamad, S. (1990) The symbol grounding problem. Physica D 42:33–46. [rRN, RFP]Google Scholar
Hernández-Peón, R., Scherrer, H. & Jouvet, M. (1956) Modification of electrical activity in the cochlear nucleus during attention in unanesthetized cats. Science 123:331–32. [KK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoffman, J., Houck, M., MacMillan, F. III & Simons, R. (1985) Event-related potentials elicited by auomatic targets: A dual task analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 11:50–61. [RFP]Google ScholarPubMed
Kallman, H. & Massaro, D. (1979) Similarity effects in backward recognition masking. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5:110–28. [RFP]Google ScholarPubMed
Kane, E. S. & Finn, R. C. (1977) Descending and intrinsic inputs to dorsal cochlear nucleus of cats: A horse radish peroxidase study. Neuroscience 2:897–912. [KK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, A. & Strayer, D. (1988) Assessing the development of automatic processing: An application of dual-task and event-related brain potential methodologies. Biological Psychology 26:231–67. [RFP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kranda, K. (1990) Modelling attention in man. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13:246. [KK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Näätänen, R. (1988) Implications of ERP data for psychological theories of attention. Biological Psychology 26:117–63. [RFP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
(1990t) The role of attention in auditory information processing as revealed by event-related potentials and other brain measures of cognitive function. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13:201–33. [rRN, CA, KK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1990r) Author's Response: Automatic and attention-dependent processing of auditory stimulus information. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13:261–78. [rRN]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Alho, K., Reinikainen, K., & Sams, M. (1987) The mismatch negativity to intensity changes in an auditory stimulus sequence. In: Current trends in event-related brain potential research ed. Johnson, R.Rohrbaugh, J. & Parasuraman, R.. Elsevier. [RFP]Google Scholar
Näätänen, R., Schroger, E., Tervaniemi, M. & Paavilainen, P. (submitted) Adaptive changes in neural mechanisms of auditory coding as reflected by the mismatch negativity. [rRN]Google Scholar
Neisser, U. (1967) Cognitive psychology. Appleton-Century-Crofts. [RFP]Google Scholar
Nordby, H., Hammerborg, D., Roth, W. T. & Hugdahl, K. (submitted) ERPs to infrequent omissions and inclusions of stimulus elements. [rRN]Google Scholar
Nordby, H., Roth, W. T. & Pfefferbaum, A. (1988) Event-related potentials to time-deviant and pitch-deviant tones. Psychophysiology 25:249–61. [rRN]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okita, T. (1987) Event-related potentials and selective attention to tones moving in location and pitch: An examination of movement velocity. Biological Psychology 24:225–36. [CA]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parasuraman, R. (1980) Effects of information processing demands on slow negative shift latencies and N1G0 amplitude in selective and divided attention. Biological Psychology 11:217–33. [CA]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Port, R. (1986) Invariance in phonetics. In: Invariance and variability in speech processes, ed. Perkell, J. & Klatt, D.. Erlbaum. [RFP]Google Scholar
(1990) Representation and recognition of temporal patterns. Connection Science 2:151–76. [RFP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuel, J., Bonfils, P. & Pujol, R. (1988) Selective attention modifies the active micromechanical properties of the cochlea. Brain Research 447:380–83. [KK]Google Scholar
Ritter, W., Paavilainen, P., Lavikainen, J., Reinikainen, K. & Näätänen, R. (in preparation) Event-related potentials to repetition and change of auditory stimuli. [rRN]Google Scholar
Roland, P. E. (1981) Somatotopical tuning of postcentral gyrus during focal attention in man. A regional cerebral blood flow study. Journal of Neurophysiology 46:744–54. [rRN]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1982) Cortical regulation of selective attention in man. A regional cerebral blood flow study. Journal of Neurophysiology 48:1059–77. [rRN]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sams, M. & Näätänen, R. (1991) Neuromagnetic responses of the human auditory cortex to short frequency glides. Neuroscience Letters 121:43–46. [rRN]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sams, M., Alho, K. & Näätänen, R. (1984) Short-term habituation and dishabituation of the mismatch negativity of the ERP. Psychophysiology 21:434–41. [RFP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sams, M., Aulanko, R., Aaltonen, O. & Näätänen, R. (1990) Event-related potentials to infrequent changes in synthesized phonetic stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2:344–57. [rRN]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scharf, B. (1990) The case for precocious effects of attention on auditory processing. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13:252–53. [KK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, W. & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) Control and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review 84:1–66. [RFP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shiffrin, R. & Dumais, S. T. (1981) The development of automatism. In: Cognitive skills and their acquisition, ed. Anderson, J. R.. Erlbaum. [RFP]Google Scholar
Shiffrin, R. M. & Schneider, W. (1977) Control and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending, and a general theory. Psychological Review 84:127–90. [RFP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel, M. F. & Watson, C. S. (1981) Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. III. Frequency discrimination with components of well-learned patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 69:223–30. [rRN, RFP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verleger, R. (1990) Top-down, fast-same, and acoustic perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13:257–58. [RFP]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, C. (1987) Uncertainty, informational masking and the capacity of immediate memory. In: Auditory processing of complex sounds, ed. Yost, W. & Watson, C. S.. Erlbaum. [RFP]Google Scholar
Watson, C. & Foyle, D. (1985) Central factors in the discrimination and identification of complex sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 78:375–80. [RFP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, C., Kelly, W. J. & Wroton, H. W. (1976) Factors in the discrimination of tonal patterns. II. Selective attention and learning under various levels of stimulus uncertainty. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 60:1176–86. [RFP]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winkler, I. & Näätänen, R. (in press) Event-related brain potentials to infrequent partial omissions in series of auditory stimuli. In: Perspectives in cognitive neurophysiology, ed. Heinze, H. J.Mangun, G. R. & Miinte, T. W.. Birkhauser. [rRN]Google Scholar
Woods, D. L., Alho, K. & Algazi, A. (1991) Brain potential signs of feature processing during selective attention. Neuroreport 2:189–92. [rRN]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed