Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:56:07.711Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Many ways to awareness: A developmental perspective on cognitive access

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 March 2008

Carroll E. Izard
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. [email protected]@[email protected]
Paul C. Quinn
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. [email protected]@[email protected]
Steven B. Most
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716. [email protected]@[email protected]

Abstract

Block's target article makes a significant contribution toward sorting the neural bases of phenomenal consciousness from the neural systems that underlie cognitive access to it. However, data from developmental science suggest that cognitive access may be only one of several ways to access phenomenology. These data may also have implications for the visual-cognitive phenomena that Block uses to support his case.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, A. K. & Phelps, E. A. (2001) Lesions of the human amygdala impair enhanced perception of emotionally salient events. Nature 411:305–09.Google Scholar
Arnell, K. M., Killman, K. V. & Fijavz, D. (2007) Blinded by emotion: Target misses follow attention capture by arousing distractors in RSVP. Emotion 7:465–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bechara, A., Damasio, H. & Damasio, A. (2000) Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 10:295307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bushnell, I. W. R., Sai, F. & Mullin, J. T. (1989) Neonatal recognition of the mother's face. British Journal of Developmental Psychology 7:315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chun, M. M. & Potter, M. C. (1995) A two-stage model for multiple target detection in rapid serial visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21:109–27.Google Scholar
Claxton, L. J., Keen, R. & McCarty, M. E. (2003) Evidence of motor planning in infant reaching behavior. Psychological Science 14:354–56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Lollo, V., Enns, J. T. & Rensink, R. A. (2000) Competition for consciousness among visual events: The psychophysics of reentrant visual processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129:481507.Google Scholar
Eimas, P. D. & Quinn, P. C. (1994) Studies on the formation of perceptually based basic-level categories in young infants. Child Development 65:903–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellsworth, C. P., Muir, D. W. & Hains, S. M. J. (1993) Social competence and person-object differentiation: An analysis of the still-face effect. Developmental Psychology 29:6373.Google Scholar
Izard, C. E. (in press) Basic emotions, natural kinds, emotion schemas and a new paradigm. Perspectives on Psychological Science.Google Scholar
Izard, C. E., Fantauzzo, C. A., Castle, J. M., Haynes, O. M., Rayias, M. F. & Putnam, P. H. (1995) The ontogeny and significance of infants’ facial expressions in the first 9 months of life. Developmental Psychology 31:9971013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, T. W., Culham, J., Humphre, G. K., Milner, A. D. & Goodale, M. A. (2003) Ventral occipital lesions impair object recognition but not object-directed grasping: An fMRI study. Brain 126:2463–75.Google Scholar
Jiang, Y., Costello, P., Fang, F., Huang, M. & He, S. (2006) A gender- and sexual orientation-dependent spatial attentional effect of invisible images. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 103:17048–52.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M. D., Eisenberger, N. I., Crockett, M. J., Tom, S. M., Pfeifer, J. H. & Way, B. M. (2007) Putting feelings into words: Affect labeling disrupts amygdala activity in response to affective stimuli. Psychological Science 18:421–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mack, A. & Rock, I. (1998) Inattentional blindness. MIT Press.Google Scholar
McCarty, M. E., Clifton, R. K. & Collard, R. R. (1999) Problem solving in infancy: The emergence of an action plan. Developmental Psychology 35:1091–101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Merker, B. (2007) Consciousness without a cerebral cortex: A challenge for neuroscience and medicine. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30:6381.Google Scholar
Milner, A. D. & Goodale, M. A. (1995) The visual brain in action. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Montague, D. P. F. & Walker-Andrews, A. S. (2001) Peekaboo: A new look at infants’ perception of emotion expressions. Developmental Psychology 37:826–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Most, S. B., Chun, M. M., Widders, D. M. & Zald, D. H. (2005a) Attentional rubbernecking: Cognitive control and personality in emotion-induced blindness. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 12:654–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Most, S. B., Scholl, B. J., Clifford, E. R. & Simons, D. J. (2005b) What you see is what you set: Sustained inattentional blindness and the capture of awareness. Psychological Review 112:217–42.Google Scholar
Most, S. B., Simons, D. J., Scholl, B. J., Jimenez, R., Clifford, E. & Chabris, C. F. (2001) How not to be seen: The contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science 12:917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muir, D. & Lee, K. (2003) The still-face effect: Methodological issues and new applications. Infancy 4:483–91.Google Scholar
Oakes, L. M. & Ribar, R. J. (2005) A comparison of infants’ categorization in paired and successive presentation familiarization tasks. Infancy 7:8598.Google Scholar
Quinn, P. C. (2006) On the emergence of perceptual organization and categorization in young infants: Roles for perceptual process and knowledge access. In: Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues, 2nd edition, ed. Balter, L. & Tamis-LeMonda, C., pp. 109–31. Psychology Press/Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Quinn, P. C. & Eimas, P. D. (1996) Perceptual organization and categorization in young infants. In: Advances in infancy research, vol. 10, ed. Rovee-Collier, C. & Lipsitt, L. P., pp. 136. Ablex.Google Scholar
Quinn, P. C. & Eimas, P. D. (1997) A reexamination of the perceptual-to-conceptual shift in mental representations. Review of General Psychology 1:271–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, P. C., Eimas, P. D. & Rosenkrantz, S. L. (1993) Evidence for representations of perceptually similar natural categories by 3- and 4-month-old infants. Perception 22:463–75.Google Scholar
Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L. & Arnell, K. M. (1992) Temporary suppression of visual processing during RSVP: An attentional blink? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 18:849–60.Google ScholarPubMed
Reiss, J. E. & Hoffman, J. E. (2006) Object substitution masking interferes with semantic processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Psychological Science 17:1015–20.Google Scholar
Simons, D. J. & Chabris, C. F. (1999) Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 28:1059–74.Google Scholar
Slater, A. & Lewis, M., eds. (2007) Introduction to infant development, 2nd edition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sommerville, J. A. & Woodward, A. L. (2005) Pulling out the intentional structure of action: The relation between action processing and action production in infancy. Cognition 95:130.Google Scholar
Stern, D. N. (1974) Mother and infant at play: The dyadic interaction involving facial, vocal, and gaze behavior. Wiley.Google Scholar
Tronick, E. Z. (1989) Emotions and emotional communication in infants. American Psychologist 44:112–19.Google Scholar
Walker-Andrews, A. S. (1998) Emotions and social development: Infants’ recognition of emotions in others. Pediatrics 102:1268–71.Google Scholar
Woodman, G. F. & Luck, S. J. (2003) Dissociations among attention, perception, and awareness during obect-substitution masking. Psychological Science 14:605–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed