Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:59:57.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

It's not just the subjects – there are too many WEIRD researchers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2010

Michael Meadon
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy and Ethics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard College Campus, Durban 4041, South Africa. [email protected]://[email protected]://ukzn.academia.edu/DavidSpurrett
David Spurrett
Affiliation:
School of Philosophy and Ethics, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard College Campus, Durban 4041, South Africa. [email protected]://[email protected]://ukzn.academia.edu/DavidSpurrett

Abstract

A literature in which most data are outliers is flawed, and the target article sounds a timely alarm call for the behavioural sciences. It also suggests remedies. We mostly concur, except for arguing that the importance of the fact that the researchers themselves are mostly outliers has been underplayed. Improving matters requires non-Western researchers, as well as research subjects.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hong, L. & Page, S. E. (2004) Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101(46):16385–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C. (2005) Modernization, cultural change and democracy. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakhani, K. R., Jeppesen, L. B., Lohse, P. A. & Panetta, J. A. (2006) The value of openness in scientific problem solving. Harvard Business School Working Paper. Available at: http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/07-050.pdf.Google Scholar
Nielsen, M. (2008) The future of science. Available at: http://michaelnielsen.org/blog/the-future-of-science-2/.Google Scholar