Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T17:05:07.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

it is not evolution, but a better game would need a better agent

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 September 2005

christian huyck  and
ian mitchell
christian huyck
Affiliation:
middlesex university, hendon, london nw4 4bt, united [email protected] http://www.cwa.mdx.ac.uk/chris [email protected] http://www.cs.mdx.ac.uk/staffpages/ianm
ian mitchell
Affiliation:
middlesex university, hendon, london nw4 4bt, united [email protected] http://www.cwa.mdx.ac.uk/chris [email protected] http://www.cs.mdx.ac.uk/staffpages/ianm
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

steels & belpaeme (s&b) refer to the neural plausibility and evolutionary plausibility of their algorithms. although this is not central to their goal of effective artificial agents, their algorithms are not neurally or evolutionarily plausible. their communication games are interesting, and more complex games would lead to more effective agents. however, the algorithms could be improved either by using standard subsymbolic algorithms or by algorithms that are really neurally or evolutionarily plausible.

Type
open peer commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , August 2005 , pp. 499 - 500
Copyright
2005 cambridge university press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)