Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:56:04.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Is liberal bias universal? An international perspective on social psychologists

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2015

Michal Bilewicz ,
Aleksandra Cichocka ,
Paulina Górska  and
Zsolt Péter Szabó
Michal Bilewicz
Affiliation:
Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 00-183 Warsaw, Poland. [email protected]://cbu.psychologia.pl/[email protected]
Aleksandra Cichocka
Affiliation:
School of Psychology, Keynes College, University of Kent Canterbury, Kent CT2 7NP, United Kingdom. [email protected]
Paulina Górska
Affiliation:
Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, 00-183 Warsaw, Poland. [email protected]://cbu.psychologia.pl/[email protected]
Zsolt Péter Szabó
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, University of Pecs, 7624 Pécs, Hungary. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Based on our comparison of political orientation and research interests of social psychologists in capitalist Western countries versus post-Communist Eastern European countries, we suggest that Duarte and colleagues' claim of liberal bias in the field seems American-centric. We propose an alternative account of political biases which focuses on the academic tendency to explain attitudes of lower status groups.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 38 , 2015 , e134
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bilewicz, M., Górska, P., Cichocka, A. & Szabó, Z. (in press) Ideological distinction. The political ideologies of social psychologists in the East and West. Czechoslovak Psychology.Google Scholar
Bilewicz, M. & Olechowski, M. (2014) Psychologia społeczna: W pułapkach zaangażowania – Polska i świat [Social psychology: Engagement trap – Poland and the world]. Stan Rzeczy [State of Affairs] 6:159–76.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1984) Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Golec, A. (2001) Konserwatyzm polityczny i potrzeba poznawczego domkniecia w badaniach polskich [Political conservatism and the need for cognitive closure in Polish studies]. Studia Psychologiczne [Psychological Studies] 1:423–58.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G. & Banaji, M. R. (1995) Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review 102:4–27.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E. & Schwartz, J. L. (1998) Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 74:1464–80.Google Scholar
Haidt, J. (2011) The bright future of post-partisan social psychology. Talk given at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, San Antonio, TX, January 27, 2011. Transcript available at: http://people.stern.nyu.edu/jhaidt/postpartisan.html Google Scholar
Hegarty, P. & Bruckmüller, S. (2013) Asymmetric explanations of group differences: Experimental evidence of Foucault's disciplinary power. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 7:176–86.Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. (2010a) Most people are not WEIRD. Nature 466:29.Google Scholar
Inbar, Y. & Lammers, J. (2012) Political diversity in social and personality psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7(5):496–503.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M. & Napier, J. L. (2009) Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology 60:307–37.Google Scholar
Kossowska, M. & van Hiel, A. (2003) The relationship between need for closure and conservative beliefs in Western and Eastern Europe. Political Psychology 24:501–18.Google Scholar
Maison, D., Greenwald, A. G. & Bruin, R. H. (2001) The Implicit Association Test as a measure of implicit consumer attitudes. Polish Psychological Bulletin 32:61–69.Google Scholar
Maison, D., Greenwald, A. G. & Bruin, R. H. (2004) Predictive validity of the Implicit Association Test in studies of brands, consumer attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 14:405–15.Google Scholar
McConnell, A. R. & Leibold, J. M. (2001) Relations among the Implicit Association Test, discriminatory behavior, and explicit measures of racial attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 37:435–42.Google Scholar
World Values Survey Association (2014) World Values Survey: 2005–2009. Official aggregate, v.20140429, ASEP/JDS, Madrid, Spain [Data set]f. Available at: http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/ Google Scholar