Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T19:51:44.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Innateness, abstract names, and syntactic cues in How Children Learn the Meanings of Words

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2002

Heidi Harley  and
Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini
Heidi Harley
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Douglass 200E, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0028 [email protected] http://w3.arizona.edu/~ling/hh
Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini
Affiliation:
Cognitive Science Program, Communication 305, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bloom masterfully captures the state-of-the-art in the study of lexical acquisition. He also exposes the extent of our ignorance about the learning of names for non-observables. HCLMW adopts an innatist position without adopting modularity of mind; however, it seems likely that modularity is needed to bridge the gap between object names and the rest of the lexicon.

Type
Brief Report
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 24 , Issue 6 , December 2001 , pp. 1107 - 1108
Copyright
© 2001 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)