Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T02:39:36.173Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The influence of communication mode on written language processing and beyond

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2017

Laura Barca  and
Giovanni Pezzulo
Laura Barca
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, 00185 Rome, Italy. [email protected]@istc.cnr.ithttp://www.istc.cnr.it/people/laura-barcahttp://www.istc.cnr.it/people/guiovanni-pezzulo
Giovanni Pezzulo
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, National Research Council, 00185 Rome, Italy. [email protected]@istc.cnr.ithttp://www.istc.cnr.it/people/laura-barcahttp://www.istc.cnr.it/people/guiovanni-pezzulo
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Empirical evidence suggests a broad impact of communication mode on cognition at large, beyond language processing. Using a sign language since infancy might shape the representation of words and other linguistic stimuli – for example, incorporating in it the movements and signs used to express them. Once integrated into linguistic representations, this visuo-motor content can affect deaf signers’ linguistic and cognitive processing.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 40 , 2017 , e47
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balota, D. A. & Chumbley, J. I. (1984) Are lexical decisions a good measures of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 10:340–57.Google Scholar
Barca, L. & Pezzulo, G. (2012) Unfolding visual lexical decision in time. PLoS ONE 7(4):e3593.Google Scholar
Barca, L. & Pezzulo, G. (2015) Tracking second thoughts: Continuous and discrete revision processes during visual lexical decision. PLoS ONE 10(2):e0116193.Google Scholar
Barca, L., Cornelissen, P., Simpson, M., Urooj, U., Woods, W. & Ellis, A. W. (2011) The neural basis of the right visual field advantage in reading: An MEG analysis using virtual electrodes. Brain and Language 118:53–71.Google Scholar
Barca, L., Pezzulo, G., Castrataro, M., Rinaldi, P. & Caselli, M. C. (2013) Visual word recognition in deaf readers: Lexicality is modulated by communication mode. PLoS ONE 8(3):e59080.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, L. W. (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22:577–600.Google Scholar
Carruthers, P. (2002) The cognitive functions of language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25:657–74.Google Scholar
Corina, D., Chiu, Y. S., Knapp, H., Greenwald, R., San Jose-Robertson, L., & Braun, A. (2007) Neural correlates of human action observation in hearing and deaf subjects. Brain Research 1152:111–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donnarumma, F., Costantini, M., Ambrosini, E., Friston, K. & Pezzulo, G. (2017) Action perception as hypothesis testing. Cortex Google Scholar
Friston, K. & Frith, C. (2015) Active inference, communication and hermeneutics. Cortex 68:129–43.Google Scholar
Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I. & Pulvermüller, F. (2004) Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron 41(2):301–307.Google Scholar
Jeannerod, M. (2006) Motor cognition. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laird, A. R., Fox, M. P., Eickhoff, S. B., Turner, J. A., Ray, K. L., McKay, D. R. & Fox, P. T. (2011) Behavioral interpretations of functional connectivity networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23(12):4022–37.Google Scholar
Lupyan, G. & Bergen, B. (2016) How language programs the mind. Topics in Cognitive Science 8(2):408–24.Google Scholar
Lupyan, G. & Clark, A. (2015) Words and the world. Predictive coding and the language-perception-cognition interface. Current Directions in Psychological Science 24(4):279–84.Google Scholar
Meteyard, L., Zokaei, N., Bahrami, B. & Vigliocco, G. (2008) Visual motion interferes with lexical decision on motions words. Current Biology 18(17):R732–33.Google Scholar
Napolitano, A., Andellini, M., Cannatà, V., Randisi, F., Bernardi, B., Castrataro, M., Pezzulo, G., Rinaldi, P., Caselli, M. C. & Barca, L. (2014) Analysis of Group ICA functional connectivity of task-driven fMRI: Application to language processes in adults with auditory deprivation. Poster at the Joint Annual Meeting ISMRM-ESMRMB 2014. Milan.Google Scholar
Pezzulo, G. (2012) The ‘Interaction Engine’: Common pragmatic competence across linguistic and non-linguistic interactions. IEEE Transaction on Autonomous Mental Development 4:105–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pezzulo, G., Barca, L. & D'Ausilio, A. (2014) The sensorimotor and social sides of the architecture of speech. [Commentary] Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37(6):569–70.Google Scholar
Pezzulo, G., Barca, L., Lamberti Bocconi, A. & Borghi, A. (2010) When affordances climb into your mind: Advantages of motor simulation in a memory task performed by novice and expert rock climbers. Brain and Cognition 73:68–73.Google Scholar
Pezzulo, G., Barsalou, L., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, M., McRae, K. & Spivey, M. (2011) The mechanics of embodiment: A dialogue on embodiment and computational modeling. Frontiers in Psychology 2(5):1–21.Google Scholar
Pezzulo, G., Candidi, M., Haris, D. & Barca, L. (2013) Action simulation in the human brain: Twelve questions. New Ideas in Psychology 31(3):270–90.Google Scholar
Pezzulo, G., Rigoli, F. & Friston, K. (2015) Active Inference, homeostatic regulation and adaptive behavioural control. Progress in Neurobiology 134:17–35.Google Scholar
Pobric, G., Jefferies, E. & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2010) Category-specific versus category-general semantic impairment induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Current Biology 20:964–68.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F. & Fadiga, L. (2010) Active perception: Sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11(5):351–60.Google Scholar
Pulvermüller, F., Huss, M., Kherif, F., Moscoso del Prado Martin, F., Hauk, O. & Shtyrov, Y. (2006) Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103:7865–70.Google Scholar
Ratcliff, R., Gomez, P. & McKoon, G. (2004) A diffusion model account of the lexical decision task. Psychological Review 111:159–82.Google Scholar
Smith, S. M., Fox, P. T., Miller, K. L., Glahn, D. C., Fox, P. M., Mackay, C. E. & Beckmann, C. F. (2009) Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(31):13040–45.Google Scholar
Spelke, E. S. (2003) What makes us smart? Core knowledge and natural language. In: Language in mind: Advances in the study of language and thought, ed. Gentner, D. & Goldin-Meadow, S., pp. 277–311. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. (1962) Thought and language. MIT.Google Scholar
Willems, R. M. & Hagoort, P. (2007) Neural evidence for the interplay between language, gesture, and action: A review. Brain and Language 101:278–89.Google Scholar