Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T19:22:46.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In search of a conceptual location to share cognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2008

Gün R. Semin  and
John T. Cacioppo
Gün R. Semin
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Sciences, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands
John T. Cacioppo
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637. [email protected]://[email protected]://psychology.uchicago.edu/people/faculty/cacioppo/
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is argued that the multilayered model offered by the shared circuits model (SCM) falls short of capturing an essential aspect of social cognition, namely, its distributed nature. The SCM therefore falls short of modeling emergent social cognition and behavior.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 37 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agre, P. E. (1997) Computation and human experience. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, L. J. (1986) Syntactic priming in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18:355–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bock, L. J. (1989) Close class immanence in sentence production. Cognition 31:163–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bock, L. J. & Loebell, H. (1990) Framing sentences. Cognition 35:1–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, R. (1999) Cambrian intelligence. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caporael, L. (1997) The evolution of truly social cognition: The core configurations model. Personality and Social Psychology Review 1:276–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chartrand, T. & Bargh, J. (1999) The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 76:893–910.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dimberg, U., Thunberg, M. & Elmehed, K. (2000) Unconscious facial reactions to emotional facial expressions. Psychological Science 11:86–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fiske, A. P. (1992) Structures of social life. Free Press.Google Scholar
Furuyama, N., Hayashi, K. & Mishima, H. (2005) Interpersonal coordination among articulations, gesticulations, and breathing movements: A case of articulation of /a/ and flexion of the wrist. In: Studies in perception and action, ed. Heft, H. & Marsh, K. L., pp. 45–48. Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hutchins, E. (1995) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kirsch, D. (1995) The intelligent use of space. Artificial Intelligence 73:31–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Brechet, Y., Vicsek, T. & Barabasi, A. L. (2000) The sound of many hands clapping: Tumultuous applause can transform itself into waves of synchronized clapping. Nature 403:849–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neumann, R. & Strack, F. (2000) “Mood contagion”: The automatic transfer of mood between persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79:211–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sachs, H. A, Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. (1974) A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50:696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semin, G. R. & Cacioppo, J. T. (in press a) Grounding social cognition: Synchronization, entrainment, and coordination. In: Embodied grounding: Social, cognitive, affective, and neuroscientific approaches, ed. Semin, G. R. & Smith, E. R.. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semin, G. R. & Cacioppo, J. T. (in press b) From embodied representation to co-regulation. In: Mirror neuron systems: The role of mirroring processes in social cognition, ed. Pineda, J. A.. Humana.Google Scholar
Smith, E. R. & Semin, G. R. (2004) Socially situated cognition: Cognition in its social context. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 36:53–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar