Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:04:15.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In defense of generalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Gene V. Glass
Gene V. Glass
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Educational Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colo. 80309
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , September 1978 , pp. 394 - 395
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Eysenck, H. J.An exercise in mega-silliness. American Psychologist. 33:517, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallo, P. S.Meta-analysis - a mixed meta-phor. American Psychologist. 33:515–517, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glass, G. V.Integrating findings: the meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education. 5:351–379, 1977.Google Scholar
Glass, G. V.Reply to Mansfield and Bussey. Educational Researcher. 7:3, 1978.Google Scholar
Glass, G. V. and Smith, M. L.Reply to Eysenck. American Psychologist. 33:517–518, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, R. S. & Bussey, T. V.Meta-analysis of research: a rejoinder to Glass. Educational Researcher. 6:3, 1977.Google Scholar
Presby, S.Overly broad categories obscure important differences between therapies. American Psychologist. 33:514–515, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, M. L., Glass, G. V. & Miller, T. I.Benefits of Psychotherapy. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, in press.Google Scholar