Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T19:47:04.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Imposed intelligibility and strong claims concerning cognitive systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2004

Roy Lachman
Roy Lachman*
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University of Houston, Houston, TX77204-5341
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The computational hypothesis was formulated with due concern for limits and is consistent with imposed intelligibility doctrines. Theories are products of scientific work that impose human classifications and formalisms on nature. The claim that “cognitive agents are dynamical systems” is untenable. Dynamical formalisms imposed on a natural system, given an approximate fit, serve as an explanatory framework and render a represented system predictable and intelligible.

Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , April 2004 , pp. 294 - 295
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Commentary on Tim van Gelder (1998). The dynamical hypothesis in cognitive science. BBS 21(5):615–665.