Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T06:55:13.060Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The importance of ontogenetic change in typical and atypical development

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2010

Tessa M. Dekker  and
Annette Karmiloff-Smith
Tessa M. Dekker
Affiliation:
Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, University of London, London WC1 7HX, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.psyc.bbk.ac.uk/research/DNL/personalpages/[email protected]://www.bbk.ac.uk/psyc/staff/academic/annettekarmilofsmith
Annette Karmiloff-Smith
Affiliation:
Centre for Brain and Cognitive Development, Birkbeck College, University of London, London WC1 7HX, United Kingdom. [email protected]://www.psyc.bbk.ac.uk/research/DNL/personalpages/[email protected]://www.bbk.ac.uk/psyc/staff/academic/annettekarmilofsmith
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The compelling case that Anderson makes for neural reuse and against modularity as organizing principle of the brain is further supported by evidence from developmental disorders. However, to provide a full evolutionary-developmental theory of neural reuse that encompasses both typical and atypical development, Anderson's “massive redeployment hypothesis” (MRH) could be further constrained by considering brain development across ontogeny.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , August 2010 , pp. 271 - 272
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bellugi, U., Lichtenberger, L., Mills, D., Galaburda, A. & Korenberg, J. R. (1999) Bridging cognition, the brain and modular genetics: Evidence from Williams syndrome. Trends in Neuroscience 22:197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, J., Johnson, M. H., Paterson, S., Gilmore, R., Gsödl, M., Longhi, E. & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2003) Spatial representation and attention in toddlers with Williams syndrome and Down syndrome. Neuropsychologia 41:1037–46.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dehaene, S. (2005) Evolution of human cortical circuits for reading and arithmetic: The “neuronal recycling” hypothesis. In: From monkey brain to human brain, ed. Dehaene, S., Duhamel, J.-R., Hauser, M. D. & Rizolatti, G., pp. 133–57. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elsabbagh, M., Cohen, H., Cohen, M., Rosen, S. & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (in press) Severity of hyperacusis predicts individual differences in speech perception in Williams syndrome. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research.Google Scholar
Han, S. & Northoff, G. (2008) Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: A transcultural neuroimaging approach. Nature Reviews: Neuroscience 9:646–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, M. H. (2001) Functional brain development in humans. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2:475–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1998) Development itself is the key to understanding developmental disorders. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2:389–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2009) Nativism versus neuroconstructivism: Rethinking the study of developmental disorders. Developmental Psychology 45(1):56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karmiloff-Smith, A., Thomas, M. S. C., Annaz, D., Humphreys, K., Ewing, S., Brace, N., van Duuren, M., Pike, G., Grice, S. & Campbell, R. (2004) Exploring the Williams syndrome face processing debate: The importance of building developmental trajectories. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 45:1258–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Orban, G. A., Van Essen, D. & Vanduffel, W. (2004) Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:315–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paterson, S. J., Brown, J. H., Gsodl, M. K., Johnson, M. H. & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1999) Cognitive modularity and genetic disorders. Science 286:2355–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinker, S. (1999) Words and rules: The ingredients of language. Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rossen, M., Klima, E. S., Bellugi, U., Bihrle, A. & Jones, W. (1996) Interaction between language and cognition: Evidence from Williams syndrome. In: Language, learning, and behavior disorders: Developmental, biological, and clinical perspectives, ed. Beitchman, J. H., Cohen, N., Konstantareas, M. & Tannock, R., pp 367–92. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Southgate, V. & Hamilton, A. F. (2008) Unbroken mirrors: Challenging a theory of autism. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 12:225–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Herwegen, J., Ansari, D., Xu, F. & Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2008) Small and large number processing in infants and toddlers with Williams syndrome. Developmental Science 11:637–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Melchner, L., Pallas, L. L. & Sur, M. (2000) Visual behavior mediated by retinal projections directed to the auditory pathway. Nature (London) 404:871–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar