Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:00:32.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Immigration, parasitic infection, and United States religiosity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2012

Jaimie N. Wall
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Pryale Hall, Rochester, MI 48309. [email protected]@oakland.eduhttp://www.ToddKShackelford.com
Todd K. Shackelford
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Oakland University, Pryale Hall, Rochester, MI 48309. [email protected]@oakland.eduhttp://www.ToddKShackelford.com

Abstract

Fincher & Thornhill (F&T) present a powerful case for the relationship between parasite-stress and religiosity. We argue, however, that the United States may be more religious than can be accounted for by parasite-stress. This greater religiosity might be attributable to greater sensitivity to immigration, which may hyperactivate evolved mechanisms that motivate avoidance of potential carriers of novel parasites.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Isernia, P., Martin, S. & Diehl, C. (2010) Transatlantic Trends: Immigration. Available at: http://trends.gmfus.org/immigration/doc/TTI2010_English_Key.pdf.Google Scholar
Limbaugh, R. (2005) Talk on The Rush Limbaugh Show, April 1. Available at: http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200504040001.Google Scholar
Livingstone Smith, D. (2011) Less than human. St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Savage, M. (2006) Talk on Savage Nation, April 10. Available at: http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/200604110005.Google Scholar
Todd, C. (2010) Comments during Joint Fiscal Review Committee Meeting, November 9. Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TE237g7KI8Y.Google Scholar