No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Hypothesis testing in experimental and naturalistic memory research
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 February 2010
Abstract
Koriat & Goldsmith's distinction between the correspondence and storehouse metaphors is valuable for both memory theory and methodology. It is questionable, however, whether this distinction underlies the heated debate about so called “everyday memory” research. The distinction between experimental and naturalistic methodologies better characterizes this debate. I compare these distinctions and discuss how the methodological distinction, between experimental and naturalistic designs, could give rise to different theoretical approaches.
- Type
- Open Peer Commentary
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996