Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:19:25.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The historical and philosophical origins of normativism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2011

Catarina Dutilh Novaes
Catarina Dutilh Novaes
Affiliation:
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, 9712 GL Groningen, The Netherlands. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Elqayam & Evans' (E&E's) critique of normativism is related to an inherently philosophical question: Is thinking a normative affair? Should thinking be held accountable towards certain norms? I present the historical and philosophical origins of the view that thinking belongs to the realm of normativity and has a tight connection with logic, stressing the pivotal role of Kant in these developments.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 34 , Issue 5 , October 2011 , pp. 253 - 254
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Descartes, R. (1985) The philosophical writings of Descartes, vol. 1, trans. Cottingham, J., Stoothoff, R. & Murdoch, D.. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
de Soto, D. (1539–1540) Aeditio Secunda Summularum. Salamanca.Google Scholar
Hergenhahn, B. R. (2009) An introduction to the history of psychology, 6th edition. Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Kant, I. (1781/1787/1929) Kritik der Reinen Vernunft. Johann Friedrich Hartknoch. (First edition = A, 1781. Second edition = B, 1787.) English edition, 1929: Critique of pure reason, trans. Kemp Smith, N.. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Korsgaard, C. (1998) The sources of normativity. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Longuenesse, B. (1998) Kant and the capacity to judge. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
MacFarlane, J. (2000) What does it mean to say that logic is formal? Doctoral Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh. Available at: http://johnmacfarlane.net/diss.html Google Scholar
Wedgwood, R. (2007) The nature of normativity. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar