Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T05:28:00.538Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High mental disorder rates are based on invalid measures: Questions about the claimed ubiquity of mutation-induced dysfunction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 November 2006

Jerome C. Wakefield
Jerome C. Wakefield*
Affiliation:
School of Social Work, New York University, New York, NY10003http://www.nyu.edu/socialwork/fac-prof-jwakefield.htm
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Three reservations about Keller & Miller's (K&M's) argument are explored: Serious validity problems afflict epidemiological criteria discriminating disorders from non-disorders, so high rates may be misleading. Normal variation need not be mild disorder, contrary to a possible interpretation of K&M's article. And, rather than mutation-selection balance, true disorders may result from unselected combinations of normal variants over many loci.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , August 2006 , pp. 424 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)