Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:52:29.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The heuristic value of controversy in science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2007

Scott O. Lilienfeld
Scott O. Lilienfeld*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322 http://www.psychology.emory.edu/clinical/lilienfeld/index.html
*
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ceci et al.'s (2006) findings remind us that tenure rarely serves its intended purpose. I argue that tenure often fails in part because many faculty members possess an insufficient appreciation for the heuristic value of controversy in science and other disciplines. Using two case examples from clinical/personality psychology, I show how controversial positions can draw sharp criticism while facilitating scientific progress.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 29 , Issue 6 , December 2006 , pp. 580 - 581
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)