Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:55:03.113Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Further evidence for, and some against, a planning–control dissociation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2004

Paul van Donkelaar  and
Paul R. Dassonville
Paul van Donkelaar*
Affiliation:
Department of Exercise and Movement Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR97405-1240www.uoregon.edu/~paulvd/lab/eye_research.html
Paul R. Dassonville*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR97405-1240psychweb.uoregon.edu/faculty/facultyinfo.htm#Dassonville
*
[email protected]
[email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

We summarize a number of recent results from our own experiments as well as those from other laboratories. Some of these results support Glover's planning/control dissociation and some are at odds with it. We suggest that the model needs to be further refined and expanded.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , February 2004 , pp. 52 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)