Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:18:55.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foresight, function representation, and social intelligence in the great apes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2012

Mathias Osvath ,
Tomas Persson  and
Peter Gärdenfors
Mathias Osvath
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Lund University, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden. [email protected]://www.fil.lu.se/persons/person.asp?filpers=693&[email protected]://www.fil.lu.se/persons/person.asp?filpers=692&[email protected]://www.fil.lu.se/persons/person.asp?filpers=691&lang=eng
Tomas Persson
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Lund University, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden. [email protected]://www.fil.lu.se/persons/person.asp?filpers=693&[email protected]://www.fil.lu.se/persons/person.asp?filpers=692&[email protected]://www.fil.lu.se/persons/person.asp?filpers=691&lang=eng
Peter Gärdenfors
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Lund University, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden. [email protected]://www.fil.lu.se/persons/person.asp?filpers=693&[email protected]://www.fil.lu.se/persons/person.asp?filpers=692&[email protected]://www.fil.lu.se/persons/person.asp?filpers=691&lang=eng
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We find problems with Vaesen's treatment of the primatological research, in particular his analysis of foresight, function representation, and social intelligence. We argue that his criticism of research on foresight in great apes is misguided. His claim that primates do not attach functions to particular objects is also problematic. Finally, his analysis of theory of mind neglects many distinctions.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , August 2012 , pp. 234 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Call, J. & Tomasello, M. (2008) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later. Trends in Cognitive Science 20:1478–84.Google Scholar
Gärdenfors, P. (2001) Slicing the theory of mind. Danish Yearbook for Philosophy 36:7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärdenfors, P. (2003) How Homo became sapiens: On the evolution of thinking. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Osvath, M. (2010) Great ape foresight is looking great. Animal Cognition 13(5):177–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osvath, M. & Osvath, H. (2008) Chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) and orangutan (Pongo abelii) forethought: Self-control and pre-experience in the face of future tool use. Animal Cognition 11(4):661–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Premack, D. & Woodruff, G. (1978) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1:515–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Preston, S. & de Waal, F. (2002) Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25:1–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suddendorf, T. & Corballis, M. (2009) How great is ape foresight? Animal Cognition 12:751–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T. & Moll, H. (2005) Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28(5):675–735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed