Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-rwnhh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-17T15:52:03.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fodor's frame problem and relevance theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

Dan Sperber  and
Deirdre Wilson
Dan Sperber
Affiliation:
Centre de Recherche en Épistémologie Appliquée, Ecole Polytechnique, Paris, France
Deirdre Wilson
Affiliation:
department of Linguistics, University College, London, United Kingdom. [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chiappe & Kukla argue that relevance theory fails to solve the frame problem as defined by Fodor. They are right. They are wrong, however, to take Fodor's frame problem too seriously. Fodor's concerns, on the other hand, even though they are wrongly framed, are worth addressing. We argue that relevance theory helps address them.

Type
Authors' Response
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 19 , Special Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 530 - 532
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Fodor, J. A. (1983) The modularity of mind. MIT Press. [DLC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fodor, J. A. (1987) Modules, frames, fridgeons, sleeping dogs and the music of the spheres. In: The robot's dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence. Ed. Pylyshyn, Z.. Ablex. [DS, DLC]Google Scholar
Hayes, P. J. (1987) What the frame problem is and isn't. In: The robot's dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence. Ed. Pylyshyn, Z.. Ablex. [DS]Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. & Hayes, P. J. (1969) Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In: Machine intelligence 4. Ed Meltzer, B. & Michie, D., Edinburgh University Press. [DS]Google Scholar
Pylyshyn, Z. (ed) (1987) The robot's dilemma: The frame problem in artificial intelligence. Ablex. [DS]Google Scholar
Sperber, D. (1994) The modularity of thought and the epidemiology of representations. In: Hirschfeld, L. A. & Gelman, S. A. (eds), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge University Press. [DS]Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1986, revised 1995) Relevance: Communication and cognition. Blackwell. [DS, DLC]Google Scholar
Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1987) Précis of Relevance: Communication and cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10:697–754. [DS, DLC]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tooby, J. & Cosmides, L. (1992) The psychological foundations of culture. In: Barkow, J., Cosmides, L. & Tooby, J. (eds.) The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press. [DS]Google Scholar