Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:36:32.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fixed versus flexible features in dissociable neural processing subsystems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 1998

E. Darcy Burgund  and
Chad J. Marsolek
E. Darcy Burgund
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 [email protected] levels.psych.umn.edu/lab/index.html
Chad J. Marsolek
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 [email protected] levels.psych.umn.edu/lab/index.html
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Implementational-level evidence of dissociable neural subsystems is a critical element that is missing from the analysis in the Schyns et al. target article. The question of whether fixed or flexible features are used in visual form recognition may have different answers for different subsystems; the evidence that features typically are created during category learning may apply most directly to a specific visual form subsystem.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 21 - 22
Copyright
© 1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)