Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T20:43:52.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fitness effects of grandparental investments in contemporary low-risk societies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 April 2010

Ralf Kaptijn  and
Fleur Thomese
Ralf Kaptijn
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected]@fsw.vu.nl
Fleur Thomese
Affiliation:
Faculty of Social Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands. [email protected]@fsw.vu.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Coall & Hertwig (C&H) suggest that, because grandparental investments do not impact on child mortality in low-risk societies, fitness effects are not plausible any more. We found that grandparental investments could very well alleviate contemporary constraints on fertility. Cultural factors may influence both the occurrence and impact of grandparental investments.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , February 2010 , pp. 29 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990) The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hakim, C. (2002) Lifestyle preferences as determinants of women's differentiated labor market careers. Work and Occupations 29:428–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakim, C. (2003) A new approach to explaining fertility patterns: Preference theory. Population and Development Review 29:349–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoem, J. M. (2008) The impact of public policies on European fertility. Demographic Research 19:249–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohli, M. (1999) Private and public transfers between generations: Linking the family and the state. European Societies 1:81–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, P. (2000) Gender equity, social institutions and the future of fertility. Journal of Population Research 17:1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myrskylä, M., Kohler, H.-P. & Billari, F. C. (2009) Advances in development reverse fertility declines. Nature 460:741–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005) Welfare state policies and the development of care arrangements. European Societies 7:321–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Portegijs, W., Cloin, M., Ooms, I. & Eggink, E. (2006) Hoe het werkt met kinderen. (How it works with children). SCP (The Netherlands' Institute for Social Research).Google Scholar