Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T04:27:04.036Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extended evolutionary theory makes human culture more amenable to evolutionary analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 December 2007

Alex Mesoudi
Alex Mesoudi
Affiliation:
Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3RQ, United Kingdom. [email protected]://amesoudi.googlepages.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Jablonka & Lamb's (J&L's) extended evolutionary theory is more amenable to being applied to human cultural change than standard neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory. However, the authors are too quick to dismiss past evolutionary approaches to human culture. They also overlook a potential parallel between evolved genetic mechanisms that enhance evolvability and learned cognitive mechanisms that enhance learnability.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 30 , Issue 4 , August 2007 , pp. 374
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aoki, K., Wakano, J. Y. & Feldman, M. W. (2005) The emergence of social learning in a temporally changing environment: A theoretical model. Current Anthropology 46:334–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (1995) Why does culture increase human adaptability? Ethology and Sociobiology 16:125–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. (2005) The origin and evolution of cultures. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, J. M. (2004) An evolutionary social science? A skeptic's brief, theoretical and substantive. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34:451–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, W. B. (2000) Invention and evolution: The case of Edison's sketches of the telephone. In: Technological innovation as an evolutionary process, ed. Ziman, J., pp. 137– 58. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. & Feldman, M. W. (1981) Cultural transmission and evolution. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Crow, J. F. (2001) The beanbag lives on. Nature 409:771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859) On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. W. & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1989) On the theory of evolution under genetic and cultural transmission with application to the lactose absorption problem. In: Mathematical evolutionary theory, ed. Feldman, M. W.. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feldman, M. W. & Laland, K. N. (1996) Gene-culture coevolutionary theory. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:453–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallpike, C. R. (1986) The principles of social evolution. Clarendon.Google Scholar
Ingold, T. (2000) The poverty of selectionism. Anthropology Today 16:1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingold, T. (2007) The trouble with “evolutionary biology.” Anthropology Today 23:3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, E. & Lamb, M. J. (1995) Epigenetic inheritance and evolution: The Lamarckian dimension. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonka, E. & Lamb, M. J. (2005) Evolution in four dimensions: Genetic, epigenetic, behavioral, and symbolic variation in the history of life. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kaplan, C. A. & Simon, H. A. (1990) In search of insight. Cognitive Psychology 22:374–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laland, K. N., Kumm, J. & Feldman, M. W. (1995) Gene-culture coevolutionary theory – a test-case. Current Anthropology 36:131–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipo, C. P., O'Brien, M. J., Collard, M. & Shennan, S., eds. (2005) Mapping our ancestors: Phylogenetic approaches in anthropology and prehistory. Aldine.Google Scholar
Mesoudi, A. (2007) Using the methods of social psychology to study cultural evolution. Journal of Social, Evolutionary and Cultural Psychology 1: 35–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A. & Laland, K. N. (2004) Is human cultural evolution Darwinian? Evidence reviewed from the perspective of The Origin of Species. Evolution 58:1–11.Google Scholar
Mesoudi, A., Whiten, A. & Laland, K. N. (2006) Towards a unified science of cultural evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29:329–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, J. H. (1994) Putting anthropology back together again: The ethnogenetic critique of cladistic theory. American Anthropologist 96:925–48.Google Scholar
Odling Smee, F. J., Laland, K. N. & Feldman, M. W. (2003) Niche construction: The neglected process in evolution. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Oyama, S., Griffiths, P. E. & Gray, R. D., eds. (2001) Cycles of contingency: Developmental systems and evolution. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rivera, M. C. & Lake, J. A. (2004) The ring of life provides evidence for a genome fusion origin of eukaryotes. Nature 431:152–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosenberg, S. M. (2001) Evolving responsively: Adaptive mutation. Nature Reviews Genetics 2:504–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suddendorf, T. & Corballis, M. C. (2007) The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30(3):299–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
West-Eberhard, M. J. (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar