Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:56:22.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

E pluribus unum? A new take on addiction by Redish et al.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2008

Thomas Stalnaker
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201
Geoffrey Schoenbaum
Affiliation:
Departments of Anatomy and Neurobiology and Psychiatry, University of Maryland School of Medicine, and Adjunct, UMBC Department of Psychology, Baltimore, MD 21201. [email protected]@schoenbaumlab.orghttp://www.schoenbaumlab.org

Abstract

Neuroscientists and psychologists have proposed a variety of well-supported theories to explain addiction. Many of these theories suggest that addiction results from a single process or dysfunction across all of its forms. The authors of the current review, in contrast, have used a well-defined theoretical account of decision-making to outline the variety of dysfunctions that could account for addictive behavior.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Addolorato, G., Leggio, L., Abenavoli, L., Gasbarrini, G. & the Alcoholism Treatment Study Group (2005) Neurobiochemical and clinical aspects of craving in alcohol addiction: A review. Addictive Behaviors 30(6):1209–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bechara, A. (2005) Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: A neurocognitive perspective. Nature Neuroscience 8(11):1458–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Chiara, G. (1999) Drug addiction as dopamine-dependent associative learning disorder. European Journal of Pharmacology 375(1–3):1330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Chiara, G. & Imperato, A. (1988) Drugs abused by humans preferentially increase synaptic dopamine concentrations in the mesolimbic system of freely moving rats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 85(14):5274–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalivas, P. W. & Volkow, N. D. (2005) The neural basis of addiction: A pathology of motivation and choice. American Journal of Psychiatry 162(8):1403–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelley, A. E. (2004a) Memory and addiction: Shared neural circuitry and molecular mechanisms. Neuron 44:161–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koob, G. F. & Le Moal, M. (1997) Drug abuse: Hedonic homeostatic dysregulation. Science 278(5335):5258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monterosso, J. R., Flannery, B. A., Pettinati, H. M., Oslin, D. W., Rukstalis, M., O'Brien, C. P. & Volpicelli, J. R. (2001) Predicting treatment response to naltrexone: The influence of craving and family history. American Journal on Addictions 10(3):258–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robbins, T. W. & Everitt, B. J. (1999) Drug addiction: Bad habits add up. Nature 398(6728):567–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Robinson, T. E. & Berridge, K. C. (2000) The psychology and neurobiology of addiction: An incentive-sensitization view. Addiction 95(S2):S91117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rocha, B. A. (2003) Stimulant and reinforcing effects of cocaine in monoamine transporter knockout mice. European Journal of Pharmacology 479(1–3):107–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roesch, M. R., Takahashi, Y., Gugsa, N., Bissonette, G. B. & Schoenbaum, G. (2007) Previous cocaine exposure makes rats hypersensitive to both delay and reward magnitude. Journal of Neuroscience 27(1):245–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoenbaum, G., Roesch, M. & Stalnaker, T. A. (2006a) Orbitofrontal cortex, decision making, and drug addiction. Trends in Neurosciences 29(2):116–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanda, G., Pontieri, F. E. & Chiara, G. D. (1997) Cannabinoid and heroin activation of mesolimbic dopamine transmission by a common µ1 opioid receptor mechanism. Science 276(5321):2048–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Volkow, N. D. & Fowler, J. S. (2000) Addiction, a disease of compulsion and drive: Involvement of the orbitofrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex 10(3):318–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wise, R. A. & Bozarth, M. A. (1987) A psychomotor stimulant theory of addiction. Psychological Review 94(4):469–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zack, M. & Poulos, C. X. (2004) Amphetamine primes motivation to gamble and gambling-related semantic networks in problem gamblers. Neuropsychopharmacology 29(1):195207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed