Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:14:46.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does one size fit all? Hurley on shared circuits

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2008

Alvin I. Goldman
Alvin I. Goldman
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy and Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-2992. [email protected]://fas-philosophy.rutgers.edu/goldman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Hurley's high level of generality suggests that a control-theoretic framework underpins all of the phenomena in question, but this is problematic. In contrast to the action-perception domain, where the control-theoretic framework certainly applies, there is no evidence that this framework equally applies to feelings and emotions, such as pain, touch, and disgust, where mirroring and simulational mindreading are also found.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , February 2008 , pp. 27 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Damasio, A. R. (2003) Looking for Spinoza. Harcourt.Google Scholar
Gallese, V. (2003) The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences 358:517–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goldman, A. (2006) Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology and neuroscience of mindreading. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, A. (in press) Mirroring, mindreading, and simulation. In: Mirror neuron systems: The role of mirroring processes in social cognition, ed. Pineda, J.. Humana Press.Google Scholar
Goldman, A. I. & Sripada, C. (2005) Simulationist models of face-based emotion recognition. Cognition 94:193–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heyes, C. (2005) Imitation by association. In: Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science, vol. 1: Mechanisms of imitation and imitation in animals, ed. Hurley, S. & Chater, N., pp. 157–76. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N. & Decety, J. (2004) How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. NeuroImage 24:771–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keysers, C. & Gazzola, V. (2006) Towards a unifying neural theory of social cognition. Progress in Brain Research 156:383–406.Google ScholarPubMed
Keysers, C. & Perrett, D. (2004) Demystifying social cognition: A Hebbian perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8:501–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Keysers, C., Wicker, B., Gazzola, V., Anton, J.-L., Fogassi, L. & Gallese, V. (2004) A touching sight: SII/PV activation during the observation of touch. Neuron 42:335–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R. & Frith, C. (2004) Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science 303:1157–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Klaas, S., Dolan, R. & Frith, C. (2006) Empathic neural responses are modulated by the perceived fairness of others. Nature 439:466–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wicker, B., Keysers, C., Plailly, J., Royet, J.-P., Gallese, V. & Rizzolatti, G. (2003) Both of us disgusted in my insula: The common neural basis of seeing and feeling disgust. Neuron 40:655–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolpert, D., Doya, K. & Kawato, M. (2003) A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. The neuroscience of social interaction, ed. Frith, C. & Wolpert, D., pp. 305–22. Oxford University Press.Google ScholarPubMed