Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T05:21:41.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Descartes' fundamental mistake: Introspective singularity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2010

Joseph E. Bogen
Joseph E. Bogen
Affiliation:
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , March 1994 , pp. 175 - 176
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bogen, J. E. (1990) Partial hemispheric independence with the neocommissures intact. In: Brain circuits and functions of the mind, ed. Trevarthen, C.. Cambridge University Press. [JEB]Google Scholar
Clarke, E. & O'Malley, C. D. (1968) The human brain and spinal cord. University of California Press. [JEB]Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1978) Brainstorms: Philosophical essays on mind and psychology. MIT Press/Bradford Books. [rDCD, AR]Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1987) The intentional stance. MIT Press/Bradford Books. [AR]Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1988) Précis of The intentional stance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11:495–546. [AR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1990) The myth of original intentionality. In: Modelling the mind, ed. Said, K. A. Mohyeldin, Newton-Smith, W. H., Viale, R. & Wilkes, K. V.. Clarendon Press. [AR]Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1991a) Real patterns. Journal of Philosophy 88:27–51. [AR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennett, D. C. (1991b) Consciousness explained. Little, Brown. [rDCD, AR]Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. & Kinsbourne, M. (1992) Time and the observer: The where and when of consciousness in the brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15:183–247. [JEB, BCJ, AR]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritsch, G. & Hitzig, E. (1870) On the electrical excitability of the cerebrum. Translated in Von Bonin, G. (1960). [JEB]Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1978) Ways of worldmaking. Harvester. [BCJ]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J. H. (1874) On the nature of the duality of the brain. Medical Press and Circulars. 1:19, 41, 63. Reprinted in: Selected writings of John Hughlings Jackson, vol. 2, ed. J. Taylor (1932). Hodder & Stoughton. [JEB]Google Scholar
Kinsbourne, M. (1982) Hemispheric specialization and the growth of human understanding. American Psychologist 37:411–20. [rDCD]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinsbourne, M. (1988) Integrated field theory of consciousness. In: Consciousness in contemporary science, ed. Marcel, A. J. & Bisiach, E.. Oxford University Press. [rDCD, JEB]Google Scholar
Libet, B. (1985) Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of unconscious will in voluntary action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8:529–66. [BCJ]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHenry, L. C. (1969) Garrison's history of neurology. C. C. Thomas. [JEB]Google Scholar
Roskies, A. L. & Wood, C. C. (1992) Cinema 1-2-Many of the Mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15:221–23. [BCJ]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryle, G. (1949) The concept of mind. Barnes & Noble. [JEB]Google Scholar
Shepard, R. N. (1992) Mental representation: Always delayed but not always ephemeral. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5:223–24. [BCJ]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Von Bonin, G., trans. (1960) The cerebral cortex, ch. 4. C. C. Thomas. [JEB]Google Scholar