Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:27:39.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dead men tell odd simple tales!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 May 2011

Robert A. M. Gregson
Robert A. M. Gregson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of New England, Armidale 2351, Australia, Electronic mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Continuing Commentary
Information
Behavioral and Brain Sciences , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 187 - 188
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baird, J. C., Green, D. M. & Luce, R. D. 1980 Variability and sequential effects in cross-modality matching of area and loudness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 6:277–89. [DL]Google ScholarPubMed
Baird, J. C. & Noma, E. 1975 Psychophysical study of numbers: I. Generation of numerical response. Psychological Research 37:281–97. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braida, L. D. & Durlach, N. I. 1972 Intensity perception. II. Resolution in one-interval paradigms. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 51:483–502. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, E. A. & Gregson, R. A. M. 1990 Julia sets for the gamma recursion in nonlinear psychophysics. Acta Applicandae Mathematicae 20:177–88. [RAMG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chignell, M. H. & Krueger, L. E. 1984 Further evidence for priming in perceptual matching: Temporal, not spatial, separation enhances the fast-same effect. Perception £ Psychophysics 36:257–65. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, D. V., Tursky, B. & Lodge, M. 1975 The role of regression and range effects in determination of the power function for electric shock. Perception & Psychophysics 18:9–14. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Amato, M. R. 1970 Experimental psychology: Methodology, psychophysics, and learning. McGraw-Hill. [rLEK]Google Scholar
Eisler, H. (1963) Magnitude scales, category scales, and Fechnerian integration. Psychological Review 70:243–53. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisler, H. & Montgomery, H. (1974) On theoretical and realizable ideal conditions in psychophysics: Magnitude and category scales and their relation. Perception £ Psychophysics 16:161–16. [rLEK]Google Scholar
Fechner, G. T. (1860) Elemente der Psychophysik. Vol. I and II. Breitkopf & Haertel. [rLEK]Google Scholar
Fechner, G. T. (1966) Elements of psychophysics. Vol. I. (Trans, by Adler, H. E..) Holt, Rinehart & Winston. [rLEK]Google Scholar
Freeman, W. J. (1988) Dynamic systems and the “subsymbolic level.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11:33–34. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garner, W. R. (1954) Context effects and the validity of loudness scales. Journal of Experimental Psychology 48:482–48. [DL, rLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibson, J. J. (1933) Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology 16:1–31. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleick, J. (1987) Chaos: Making a new science. Viking Penguin. [rLEK]Google Scholar
Gregson, R. A. M. (1988) Nonlinear psychophysical dynamics. L. Erlbaum Associates. [rLEK, RAMG]Google Scholar
Gregson, R. A. M. (1989a) A nonlinear systems approach to Fechner's paradox. Biological Cybernetics 61:611–61. [RAMG]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregson, R. A. M. (1989b) Nonlinear psychophysics in higher dimensionality. Paper presented at the 20th European Mathematical Psychology Meeting, Catholic University of Nijmegen, Netherlands. [RAMG]Google Scholar
Gregson, R. A. M. & Britton, L. A. (1989) The size-weight illusion in 2-D nonlinear psychophysics. Paper presented at the Australian 15th Experimental Psychology Meeting, University of Wollongong, NSW. [RAMG]Google Scholar
Grossberg, S. (1988) Nonlinear neural networks: Principles, mechanisms, and architectures. Neural Networks 1:17–61. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, R. A. (1991) Exploring chaos in psychophysical systems; a Review of Gregson, R. A. M. Nonlinear psychophysical dynamics. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 34(1). [rLEK, RAMG]Google Scholar
Helson, H. (1964) Adaptation-level theory: An experimental and systematic approach to behavior. Harper & Row. [rLEK]Google Scholar
Hood, D. C. & Finkelstein, M. A. (1979) Comparison of changes in sensitivity and sensation: Implications for the response-intensity function of the human photopic system. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5:391–405. [DL]Google ScholarPubMed
Jesteadt, W., Wier, C. C. & Green, D. M. (1977) Intensity discrimination as a function of frequency and sensation level. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61:611–61. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, N. L. (1949) Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation. Biometrika 36:361–36. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knibestōl, M. & Vallbo, Å. B. (1980) Intensity of sensation related to activity of slowly adapting mechanoreceptive units in the human hand. Journal of Physiology 300:3002–300. [GSW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krueger, L. E. (1982) Single judgments of numerosity. Perception £ Psychophysics 31:311–31. [rLEK]Google ScholarPubMed
Krueger, L. E. (1984) Perceived numerosity: A comparison of magnitude production, magnitude estimation, and discrimination judgments. Perception £ Psychophysics 35:355–35. [rLEK]Google ScholarPubMed
Krueger, L. E. (1989a). Psychophysical law: Keep it simple. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12:122–12. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, L. E. (1989b) Reconciling Fechner and Stevens: Toward a unified psychophysical law. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12(2):251–67. [rLEK, DL, RAMG, GSW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laming, D. (1984) The relativity of ‘absolute’ judgements. The British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 37:152–83. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krueger, L. E. (1985) Some principles of sensory analysis. Psychological Review 92:462–85. [DL]Google Scholar
Krueger, L. E. (1986) Sensory Analysis. Academic Press. [DL]Google Scholar
Krueger, L. E. (1989) Experimental evidence for Fechner's and Stevens's laws. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12(2):277–81. [GSW]Google Scholar
Legge, G. E. & Viemeister, N. F. (1988) Sensory analysis in vision and audition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11:301–2. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lit, A. (1949) The magnitude of the Pulfnch stereophenomenon as a function of binocular differences of intensity at various levels of illumination. American Journal of Psychology 62:621–62. [rLEK]Google ScholarPubMed
Marks, L. E. (1974) Sensory processes: The new psychophysics. Academic Press. [rLEK]Google Scholar
May, R. M. (1976) Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature 261:459–67. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCollough, C. (1965) Color adaptation of edge-detectors in the human visual system. Science 149:1115–16. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGill, W. J. (1989) Rubber scales and partial quantification. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:283–84. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGill, W. J. & Teich, M. C. (1989) A unique approach of stimulus detection theory in psychophysics based upon the properties of zero-mean Gaussian noise. Book review of D. Laming, Sensory analysis. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 33:99–108. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1974) Stanley Smith Stevens: 1906–1973. American Journal of Psychology 87:279–88. [rLEK]Google Scholar
Montgomery, H. (1975) Direct estimation: Effect of methodological factors on scale type. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 16:19–29. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newman, E. B. (1973) Stevens's operationism. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54:864–66. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norwich, K. H. (1984) The psychophysics of taste from the entropy of the stimulus. Perception £ Psychophysics 35:269–78. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norwich, K. H. (1987) On the theory of Weber fractions. Perception £ Psychophysics 42:286–98. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norwich, K. H. (1989) The Fechner-Stevens law is the law of transmission of information. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 12:285. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollack, J. B. (1989) Implications of recursive distributed representations. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, ed. Touretzky, D.. Morgan Kaufmann. [rLEK]Google Scholar
Pool, R. (1989a) Is it chaos, or is it just noise? Science 243:25–28. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pool, R. (1989b) Chaos theory: How big an advance? Science 245:26–28. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, I. R. & Gregson, R. A. M. (1988) Nonlinear dynamics in a complex cubic one-dimensional model for sensory psychophysics. Acta Mathematicae Applicandae 11:1–17. [RAMG]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prigogine, I. & Stengers, I. (1984) Order out of chaos: Man's new dialogue with nature. Bantam Books. [rLEK]Google Scholar
Proctor, R. W. & Rao, K. V. (1983) Evidence that the same-different disparity in letter matching is not attributable to response bias. Perception £ Psychophysics 34:72–76. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulton, E. C. (1968) The new psychophysics: Six models for magnitude estimation. Psychological Bulletin 69:1–19. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulton, E. C. (1979) Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude. Psychological Bulletin 86:777–803. [DL]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulton, E. C. (1989) Bias in quantifying judgments. Erlbaum. [rLEK, DL]Google Scholar
Ross, J. & di, Lollo V. (1970) A consistent failure of the power law for lifted weight. Perception £ Psychophysics 8:289–90. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. F. (1986) Fundamentals of sensory physiology. Springer Verlag. [GSW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuster, H. G. (1984) Deterministic chaos: An introduction. Weinheim Physik-Verlag. [rLEK]Google Scholar
Shaw, R. (1981) Strange attractors, chaotic behavior, and information flow. Zeitschrift fuer Naturforschung 36A:80–112. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, J. A. & Siegel, W. (1972) Absolute judgment and paired-associate learning: Kissing cousins or identical twins? Psychological Review 79:300–16. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skarda, C. A. & Freeman, W. J. (1987) How brains make chaos in order to make sense of the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10:161–95. Continuing commentary (1988) 11:557–59. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, J. G. (1975) Psychophysics. In: Experimental sensory psychology (pp. 17–67). ed. Scharf, B.. Scott Foresman. [rLEK]Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1939) Psychology and the science of science. Psychological Bulletin 36:221–63. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1958) Adaptation-level vs. the relativity of judgment. American Journal of Psychology 71:633–46. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stevens, S. S. (1959) Sic transit gloria varietatis? Review of L. L. Thurstone: The Measurement of Values. Contemporary Psychology 4:388–89. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1971) Issues in psychophysical measurement. Psychological Review 78:426–50. [rLEK, DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, S. S. (1975) Psychophysics. Wiley. [rLEK, DL]Google Scholar
Stevens, S. S. & Greenbaum, H. (1966) Regression effect in psychophysical judgment. Perception £ Psychophysics 1:439–46. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treisman, M. (1963) Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval: Implications for a model of the “internal clock”. Psychological Monographs 77:No. 576. [DL]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, L. M. (1990) Chaos in psychophysics? Review of R. A. M. Gregson, Nonlinear psychophysical dynamics. Contemporary Psychology 35:338–40. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, R. M. (1981) Measurement of sensory intensity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4:175–89. Commentary, 189–223. Continuing commentary. (1983). 6:316–20. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, R. M. (1985) Criterion shift rule and perceptual homeostasis. Psychological Review 92:574–84. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wasserman, G. S., Felsten, G. & Easland, G. S. (1979) The psychophysical function: Harmonizing Fechner and Stevens. Science 204:85–87. [GSW]CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wasserman, G. S. & Kong, K. -L. (1979) Absolute timing of mental activities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2:243–55. [GSW]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, B. J. & Shlesinger, M. (1990) The noise in natural phenomena. American Scientist 78:40–45. [rLEK]Google Scholar
Zak, M. (1989) Terminal attractors in neural networks. Neural Networks 2:259–79. [rLEK]CrossRefGoogle Scholar